ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% |
| 2 | CHEN Xiaohan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 3 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
| 3 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 5 | TAO Hannah J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 6 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 7 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | |
| 8 | BILILIES Sophia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 9% | |
| 9 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 10 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 8% |
| 11 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 12 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 16% | |
| 13 | FAN Grace | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | WU Helen | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 15 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 16 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 4% |
| 18 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 19 | SADOVA Olga | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
| 20 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 21 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
| 22 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | |
| 24 | XIKES Katherine E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 3% |
| 25 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 27 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% | |
| 28 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
| 29 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% | |
| 30 | BROWN Delaney | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 31 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 32 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 22% | 3% | |
| 34 | NEWELL Alexia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
| 35 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 36 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 99% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | |
| 38 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 95% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 99% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 40 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 41 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 43 | PATNAIK Nastassia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% | |
| 44 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
| 45 | HORMEL Molly | 100% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 47 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | XIAO julie | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 99% | 83% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LI Angela | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | BÁEZ Sophia | 100% | 81% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 54 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | COLLINS Audrey | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | CHERCHEVER Julia | 100% | 90% | 19% | 1% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZHOU Leah | 100% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 59 | DUBETSKY Ashley | 100% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.