ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 41% | 35% |
| 2 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 2% | 15% | 45% | 38% | |
| 3 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 32% |
| 3 | KHAN Alissa | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 5 | GOMERMAN Sophia | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 5 | ZENG Sarah | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% | |
| 7 | NAYAK Esha | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 8 | SHI Julia | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 9 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 10 | DAI Olivia | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 11 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% | |
| 12 | HUANG Rachael | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 13 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHANG Sophie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 16 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 17 | MALEK Zolie | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 18 | WU Helen | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
| 19 | HE Lizbeth | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 18% |
| 20 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
| 21 | FLATT Sophia | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 22 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% |
| 23 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 35% | 16% |
| 24 | MUND Ruth | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 25 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
| 26 | YAN Lena | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 27 | CHAVAN Arya | 2% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 28 | ZHENG Valentina | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | KHOST Maeve | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | LIU Yifei | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 31 | YU Zhiang | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | HU Anna | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | CHO Kaeli M. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | - |
| 35 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 25% | |
| 36 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | YOUNG Audrey | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | BERRIOS Catalina | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 39 | LAURI Keira | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 41 | MYAT Chloe | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 44 | KUANG TongFei | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | GUVEN Coco | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 46 | BUSH Bethany | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 47 | MARGULIAN Maria | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 48 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 11% | 36% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 49 | ALTIRS Kate | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 50 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 2% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 50 | GUGALA Hanna | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 52 | KNOBEL Sophia | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 54 | LIM Alexa J. | 2% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 55 | LAGOON Miriam | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 56 | KANDADAI Lara | 3% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 57 | CHOU Amy R. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 58 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% | |
| 60 | LI Alexis | 7% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | NEUMAN Ella | 3% | 22% | 47% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 62 | HO Sophia | 48% | 43% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 63 | MAGITSKY Leila | 40% | 40% | 16% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 64 | KULIK Sophia | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 65 | SVENSSON Siri Lin | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 66 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | ONG Lauren | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | BORGUETA Madison | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 69 | ALAMI Amira | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 70 | METTKE Ella | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 71 | BERNSTEIN Avery | 6% | 35% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 71 | CHO-SAYEGH Emily | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 73 | SALANDY Lilly | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.