ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 35% |
2 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | |
3 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 32% |
3 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
5 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | |
5 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
7 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
8 | SHI Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
9 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
10 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
11 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% | |
12 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
13 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
14 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
15 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
16 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
17 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 20% | 3% |
18 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% |
19 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
20 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 23% | 3% |
21 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
23 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 16% |
24 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
25 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% |
26 | YAN Lena | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
27 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 98% | 74% | 32% | 6% | - | |
28 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
29 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
31 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
32 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
33 | HU Anna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
34 | CHO Kaeli M. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | < 1% | - |
35 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 25% | |
36 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
37 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
38 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 2% |
39 | LAURI Keira | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
40 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
41 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
42 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
42 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
44 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
45 | GUVEN Coco | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
46 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
47 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
48 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | |
49 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
50 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 7% | 1% | |
50 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
52 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
53 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
54 | LIM Alexa J. | 100% | 98% | 79% | 38% | 8% | 1% | |
55 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
56 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
57 | CHOU Amy R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
58 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
59 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% | |
60 | LI Alexis | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 97% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
62 | HO Sophia | 100% | 52% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
63 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | KULIK Sophia | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
65 | SVENSSON Siri Lin | 100% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
66 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
67 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
68 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
69 | ALAMI Amira | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
70 | METTKE Ella | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | |
71 | BERNSTEIN Avery | 100% | 94% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
71 | CHO-SAYEGH Emily | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
73 | SALANDY Lilly | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.