ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WU Julianna Y. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 42% |
| 2 | XIANG Emma | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 13% | |
| 3 | CHO Rebecca H. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
| 3 | CHOW Annabelle | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 5 | FU Qihan | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 31% | |
| 6 | ORVANANOS Anice | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 7 | GU EMILY | - | - | 6% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
| 8 | SHA Yi Ling | - | 2% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% |
| 9 | OLIVEIRA Lavinia M. | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
| 10 | LEVY Avery | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 2% |
| 11 | LIU Sophia | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 38% | 13% |
| 12 | WANG Jasmine | - | 3% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 7% |
| 13 | UNGERER Frieda | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 14 | ZHOU Catherine | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | MARKOVSKY Nina | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 33% | 4% |
| 16 | SCARLETT Skye | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 17 | WONG Sophia M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 18 | LIN Victoria T. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 19 | ZHENG Julie | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
| 20 | ROY Layla | - | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 29% |
| 21 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 22 | ASCHETTINO Aurora | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 23 | DENYSIUK Sumajja | 5% | 43% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 24 | SA Milla | 9% | 43% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | RASO Olivia | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 26 | MEYER Claudia | 1% | 21% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 27 | NEWMAN Ariel | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
| 28 | HOU Wendong | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | CHARALEL Jessica | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 30 | HUNT Abigail S. | 1% | 15% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | HATZOGLU Isabella | 50% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | RICHARDS Ella | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | SHMAY Anastasia | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 33 | DONG TianTian | 42% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | SLASKI Caroline O. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
| 36 | JIANG Claire | 8% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | KAPOOR Saanvi | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | BENNETT Abigail | 24% | 47% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 39 | FULIGNI Isabella | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | DALBERG Meadow | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | VAROQUA Tala | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.