Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZAGUNIS Mariel L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 2 | THOMPSON Kamali A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 3 | RUSSO Francesca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 13% |
| 3 | MICHEL Violet N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 5 | BURKE Nora S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 6 | TARTAKOVSKY Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 7 | CZYZEWSKI Veronica O. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 8 | FOX-GITOMER Chloe N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 9 | SHELTON Aleksandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 36% |
| 10 | JENKINS Ryan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 24% |
| 11 | SINGLETON-COMFORT Leanne | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 12 | LINDER Kara E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 13 | ADYNSKI Gillian I. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
| 14 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 15 | MENTZER Katherine | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 16 | HIRSCH Sydney R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
| 17 | TIMOFEYEV Daniella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% |
| 18 | MERZA Celina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 19 | LU Vivian Y. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 20 | GREENBAUM Atara R. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 21 | LITYNSKI Jacqueline Z. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 22 | POSSICK Lola P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 23 | THEODORE Maria A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 24 | HOFFMAN Ilsa L. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 25 | KIM Zoe | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | CHEN Erin Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 27 | MILLER Sky | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
| 28 | LIANG Megan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 29 | CHAMBERLAIN Maia C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 30 | WILLIAMS Chloe C. | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | STRZALKOWSKI Aleksandra (Ola) M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | WHANG Rebecca | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 33 | GOUHIN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 34 | JENKINS Morgan J. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | PARKER Abigale B. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 36 | ANGLADE Alexis C. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 37 | WHITE Amber L. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | HARRILL Gillian N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 39 | OISHI Megumi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 40 | CHERNOMORSKY Maria | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | BERMAN Stella | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | GUTHIKONDA Nithya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | HOOGENDOORN Sterre | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | HE Charlotte | 100% | 82% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 92% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 48 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | YUN Joy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 51 | MOYA Keona L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 52 | TONG Kunling | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 53 | HUNTER Nina B. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 54 | WILLIAMS Jadeyn E. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
| 55 | JOHNSON Edith (Tori) V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 27% | |
| 56 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 57 | HASSAN Aziza R. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 58 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 59 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 60 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | BROWNE Alexis G. | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 61 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 64 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | ROH Rachel E. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 66 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 67 | WANG Caroline Y. | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.