April Championship and NAC

Div II Men's Saber

Friday, April 12, 2019 at 2:00 PM

Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 ZHOU Matthew R. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.1 6 +0.9
2 SOHN Kevin J. V V V V D V V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
3 WUN William V V D V V D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
3 YAN Jack P. V V V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
5 FLORES Peter D. V D V V V V V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
6 TANG Brendan J. V V V V V D V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
7 YOUNG Nash D V V D V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
8 CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. D V D D V V V V V D 3.9 3 -0.9
9 KANG Brandon M. V V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
10 DHINGRA Gian K. V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
11 QUAN Nicholas V V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
12 MOSZCZYNSKI Adam V V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
13 WINKLER Lucas G. V V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
14 LEVIN Mark A. V V D D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
15 CORNEJO Jeffrey A. V V D D D V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
16 DANNULL Linus N. D D V D V D V V V D 4.8 2 -2.8
17 MCMANIGAL Matthew L. V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
18 TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
19 ZU Kevin V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
20 BARBER Brendan V V V V V D V D 2.1 5 +2.9
21 PORTMANN Stein J. V D V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
22 ASHBY Ethan J. D V D V V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
23 TANG Alex Y. V D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
24 WESLER Logan A. D V V D V V V D 2.3 4 +1.7
25 KADID Mohammed F. V V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
26 NEUHEARDT Peter D V V V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
27 AUSTIN Adam V V D D D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
28 MORRIS Samuel A. V D V V D D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
29 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. V D D D V V D 3.3 2 -1.3
30 LIU kelly D D V V D V D 2.0 2 -
31 CHEONG Heonjae D V V D D D V V D 3.5 2 -1.5
32 VILLARREAL Mateo D D D D D D V V D 0.8 0 -0.8
33 ELIN Adam E. V V V V D V D 2.2 5 +2.8
34 ERACHSHAW Taras P. V V V V V D D 4.0 5 +1.0
35 KIM Benjamin H. D V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
36 HOUTZ Jackson V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
37 MENON Rohan C. D V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
38 COVINGTON Max G. V V D V V D D 3.5 4 +0.5
39 WILDMAN John D V V V D V D 3.3 4 +0.7
40 GILLIGAN Wolff V V D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
41 OWENS William V D V V D D 3.6 3 -0.6
42 FONZO Ian D V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
43 SINGER Carson D D D V V V D 4.8 3 -1.8
44 BRUSIE Christopher R. D V D V D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
45 HUDDY Brandon J. D D D V V V D 2.6 3 +0.4
46 POPE Nico D V D D V V D 3.0 3 -
47 WU Nicholas R. D V V V D D D 2.7 3 +0.3
47 REBELLO Derek D D D V V V D 2.0 3 +1.0
49 SHANAHAN Adam E. V D V D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
50 RAJA Arnav D V V D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
51 RABINKOV Anthony V D V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
52 HASNAH Henry D D D V V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
53 SUORSA Markus V V D D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
54 BARBER William S. D D D V V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
55 LE Hayden V D D D V D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
56 COTTER Liam D V V D D D V D 4.6 2 -2.6
57 HUANG Zekai V D D V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
58 KOTOV Leonid V V D D D D V D 1.4 2 +0.6
59 YEN Preston D D V V D D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
60 MOORE Evan M. D V V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
61 HUANG Eric D D D V D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
62 BERGER Oliver D D D D V V D 3.0 1 -2.0
63 MENON Rishi D V D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
64 HENNICKE Michael G. D D D D D D V D 3.5 0 -3.5
65 LU Evan D D V D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
66 EPSTEIN Henry N. V D D D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
67 PEARSON James G. V D D V D D D 1.1 2 +0.9
68 DESAI Drewv D. D D D V D D 3.0 1 -2.0
69 GREENBAUM Ian L. D D V D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
70 REED Samuel J. D D V D D D D 1.4 1 -0.4
71 BRAR Sanjeet D D V D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
72 LEITH Jack D D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
73 MADRID Derek D D V D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
74 LEUNG Matthew D D D D D V D 1.4 1 -0.4
75 LEUNG Nathan V D D D D D D 0.6 1 +0.4
76 HICHA Paul R. V D D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
77 SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
78 KILBOURNE Lance D D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
79 TIERNO Thomas J. D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
80 ESPARZA Hilario D D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.