Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% |
2 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
3 | WUN William | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
3 | YAN Jack P. | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
5 | FLORES Peter D. | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
6 | TANG Brendan J. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
7 | YOUNG Nash | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 44% | 22% |
8 | CAPPELLUTI Ryan M. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
9 | KANG Brandon M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
10 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
11 | QUAN Nicholas | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 19% |
12 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 27% | 9% |
13 | WINKLER Lucas G. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 39% | 11% | |
14 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
15 | CORNEJO Jeffrey A. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
16 | DANNULL Linus N. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 24% |
17 | MCMANIGAL Matthew L. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
18 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
19 | ZU Kevin | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
20 | BARBER Brendan | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
21 | PORTMANN Stein J. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
22 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
23 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
24 | WESLER Logan A. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
25 | KADID Mohammed F. | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
26 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
27 | AUSTIN Adam | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
28 | MORRIS Samuel A. | - | 3% | 12% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
29 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
30 | LIU kelly | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
31 | CHEONG Heonjae | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
32 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 38% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | ELIN Adam E. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
34 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
35 | KIM Benjamin H. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
36 | HOUTZ Jackson | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
37 | MENON Rohan C. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
38 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
39 | WILDMAN John | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
40 | GILLIGAN Wolff | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% | |
41 | OWENS William | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
42 | FONZO Ian | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
43 | SINGER Carson | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
44 | BRUSIE Christopher R. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
45 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
46 | POPE Nico | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
47 | WU Nicholas R. | 1% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
47 | REBELLO Derek | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
49 | SHANAHAN Adam E. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
50 | RAJA Arnav | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
51 | RABINKOV Anthony | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
52 | HASNAH Henry | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
53 | SUORSA Markus | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
54 | BARBER William S. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
55 | LE Hayden | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
56 | COTTER Liam | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 17% |
57 | HUANG Zekai | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
58 | KOTOV Leonid | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
59 | YEN Preston | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
60 | MOORE Evan M. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
61 | HUANG Eric | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
62 | BERGER Oliver | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
63 | MENON Rishi | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
64 | HENNICKE Michael G. | < 1% | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
65 | LU Evan | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
66 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
67 | PEARSON James G. | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
68 | DESAI Drewv D. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
69 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
70 | REED Samuel J. | 16% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
71 | BRAR Sanjeet | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
72 | LEITH Jack | 16% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
73 | MADRID Derek | 14% | 33% | 31% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
74 | LEUNG Matthew | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
75 | LEUNG Nathan | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
76 | HICHA Paul R. | 4% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
77 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
78 | KILBOURNE Lance | 3% | 31% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
79 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
80 | ESPARZA Hilario | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.