Glenview Park District - Glenview, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
| 2 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 59% |
| 3 | MCKEEVER Luca | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 3 | SONN Rohan | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 5 | MICKO Fritz K. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 6 | NIKOLOV Peter | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 7 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 8 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | NGUYEN Tate | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 10 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 11 | KULIKOWSKI Adam J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 46% | 13% |
| 12 | SILVERS Ari | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | TOPAZ Nicholas | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 14 | DENNIS Ethan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 15 | LITWILLER Joseph | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 16 | KARNAS Karol | 1% | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | CORRALES Victor M. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 18 | RICHARDSON Ray | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 19 | ELYADERANI Paxon | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 20 | AGARWAL Adheesh | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | ZHENG Jerry | 16% | 43% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 22 | SPINA Joseph B. | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 23 | LEE Daniel J. | 4% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 24 | BARTCH Ethan L. | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 25 | BRADFORD Ethan | 31% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 26 | BRUNO Enzo | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 27 | MIEZIANKO Sebastian A. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 28 | BANSAL Shaurya | 44% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.