Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | 1% | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 2 | PENG Amber L. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 3 | PANT Anisha | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
| 3 | CHUNG Jaein | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
| 5 | LUO Sandra J. | 2% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 6 | SUN Ruoxi | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 7 | SU Alena J. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 8 | LEE Bethanie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 9 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 10 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 11 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 12 | LEE Samantha X. | 3% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 13 | UMAP Arna | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 14 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 15 | LIN Katherine Y. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 16 | KOSLOW Amicie | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | WANG Zoie Z. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
| 18 | KIM Rachel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 19 | MITLOFF Allison | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 3% |
| 20 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 21 | LUH Mia P. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 23 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 24 | RAO Sonia D. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | ZHENG Zoe | - | 6% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 3% | |
| 26 | FUNG Emma | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 27 | DUONG Zoey | 10% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | MANN Sophia J. | 2% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 29 | TSANG Catherine | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | GONG Chloe | 16% | 43% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | FUNG Vera | 13% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 32 | CONTOS Athena | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WANG Celine S. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 35 | DAYAL Saahira | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 36 | THOMAS Saejel | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | ENRILE Erica | 3% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 39 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | NICKOLOV Nora | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 41 | XU Audrey J. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 42 | BOLES Amanda X. | 21% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | BENNETT Vienne | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | YANG Chloee | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.