Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | PENG Amber L. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.1 | 6 | +1.9 |
| 3 | PANT Anisha | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | CHUNG Jaein | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 5 | LUO Sandra J. | V V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 5 | +2.7 |
| 6 | SUN Ruoxi | V V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 7 | SU Alena J. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 8 | LEE Bethanie | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 9 | BHARATHI Maithreyi S. | V V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 10 | SUN Chien-Yu | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 11 | TOM Caitlyn | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | LEE Samantha X. | V V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 13 | UMAP Arna | D V V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 14 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | D V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 15 | LIN Katherine Y. | V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | KOSLOW Amicie | V V D V D | V V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 17 | WANG Zoie Z. | D V V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 18 | KIM Rachel | V V D V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | MITLOFF Allison | V V V D D V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | V V D D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 21 | LUH Mia P. | D D V V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 22 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | ZHANG Eunice | V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 24 | RAO Sonia D. | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 25 | ZHENG Zoe | V V D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | FUNG Emma | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | DUONG Zoey | D D D D V V | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 28 | MANN Sophia J. | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 29 | TSANG Catherine | D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 30 | GONG Chloe | D D V D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | FUNG Vera | D D V D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | CONTOS Athena | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | WANG Celine S. | D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 35 | DAYAL Saahira | D V D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 36 | THOMAS Saejel | D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 37 | ENRILE Erica | V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 39 | MANIKTALA Prisha | D D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 40 | NICKOLOV Nora | V D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 41 | XU Audrey J. | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 42 | BOLES Amanda X. | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 43 | BENNETT Vienne | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 44 | YANG Chloee | D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.