Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SATHYANATH Kailing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
2 | KOBOZEVA Tamara V. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
3 | CHERNOMORSKY Alexandra E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% |
3 | SHOMAN Miriam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% |
5 | FREEDMAN Janna N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
6 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
7 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
8 | EDGINGTON Grace | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
9 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
10 | ZINNI Kaylyn M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
11 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
12 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
13 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
14 | ZUO Xiaofan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
15 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
16 | HAYES Grace Y. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
17 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | < 1% |
18 | KOBERSTEIN Maggie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
19 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
20 | YODER Bridget H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% |
21 | TURNOF Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
22 | MANUBAG Amanda R. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
23 | KOO Samantha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% | |
24 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 21% | |
25 | DESAI Maya D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
26 | CHEN Chloe Y. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
27 | SPORN Melanie | 100% | 92% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
28 | KITTLE Lauren | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
29 | ZIELINSKI Isabella G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 3% |
30 | DAVIS Jayna M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
31 | ROBINSON Stella | 100% | 93% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | ENDO Miyuki N. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
34 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
35 | DEMING Clare L. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 48% | 18% | 3% |
36 | YURT Leyla | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
37 | WONG ERIKA G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
38 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
39 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
40 | RHIE Lena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
41 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
42 | LIM Isabel K. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
43 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
44 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
45 | GARIBIAN Emma E. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
46 | NOBREGA Carolina S. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
47 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
48 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
49 | ZHANG Lynn Y. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
50 | LAPP Laurie E. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
51 | SAKPAL Raghavi | 100% | 80% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
52 | WHEELER Kira | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
53 | VANCE Beth S. | 100% | 94% | 72% | 39% | 13% | 3% | - |
54 | KIM Sujin | 100% | 85% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
55 | DANIELS Erica | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 5% | - |
56 | FAN Jiayi | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
57 | KSHIRSAGAR Prachi | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
58 | KIM Nam Heui | 100% | 88% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
59 | PETE Gillian C. | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | GAJOWSKYJ Sophie K. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
61 | WALTER Joanne | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.