Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAYLOR Daryl J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 2 | DRAGONETTI Walter E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% |
| 3 | HENZLER Thomas A. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 43% | 20% | |
| 3 | RIDGE John (Drew) A. | - | 3% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
| 5 | ALEXANDER Chuck | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% | |
| 6 | SCHNEIDER Charles (Charlie) J. | 2% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 7 | MARIANI Lou | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 8 | DARRICAU Henri J. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 9 | NEALE James H. | - | 3% | 23% | 42% | 27% | 5% | |
| 9 | NEWSOME James L. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 11 | RICHARDS Dick | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% | |
| 12 | BEIHOLD James (Jim) K. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 13 | KING Charles M. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | MASE James B. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | |
| 15 | KING Richard (Dick) M. | 20% | 52% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 16 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | 1% | 21% | 43% | 29% | 6% | |
| 17 | KAROLAK Dale W. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 46% | 9% |
| 18 | MOREAU John A. | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 19 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 27% | 5% | |
| 20 | WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) | 7% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 43% | 12% | |
| 22 | GELNAW William (Gypsy) H. | 1% | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | SIMMONS Matthew C. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 24 | WALKER William H. | 1% | 10% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 25 | WATSON Donald W. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
| 26 | MCTIGUE J. Michael | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | |
| 27 | WHEELER Mark C. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 28 | SCOTT George R. | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 29 | GROSS Louis A. | 7% | 63% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 30 | REDDING Russel M. | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 31 | KLEIN Johannes | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 32 | RESS Michael A. | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 34 | HERMAN Ronald J. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 35 | KRICK Jon | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | SIMS Wallace F. | 18% | 50% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 5% | 44% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | MYERS Brent M. | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | KLUCZYNSKI Mike k. | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | WILSON Victor T. | < 1% | 1% | 12% | 38% | 42% | 6% | |
| 41 | SNYDER John W. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | POMPIAN Mark | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 67% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.