March NAC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Friday, March 4, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 ZHANG Yunjia - - - 24% 75%
2 EYER Hailey M. - - - - 1% 16% 83%
3 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. - - - - 1% 20% 78%
3 FEDELI Caterina S. - - - - 2% 23% 75%
5 ORVANANOS Anice - - 1% 5% 22% 44% 28%
6 LIU Angel(Daying) - - 2% 14% 37% 36% 10%
7 NISSINOFF Alexandra - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 19%
8 LUO Sandra J. - 1% 7% 27% 43% 22%
9 LIU Joy Zhaoyi - - - - 3% 24% 73%
10 MEI Sarah - - - 3% 20% 45% 32%
11 GOOR Viviene E. - - - 6% 45% 48%
12 SONG Yuqiao Aprille - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 23%
13 MI Aileen - - - 6% 38% 48% 8%
14 DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia - - - 1% 9% 38% 52%
14 HAYES Nadia - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25%
16 YANG Iris - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
17 SEO IRENE Y. - - 1% 5% 23% 44% 27%
18 CHO Rebecca H. - - - - 2% 23% 75%
19 CALISE Ella - - 2% 12% 35% 40% 10%
20 CHEN Chloe I. - - 2% 14% 43% 41%
21 AMR HOSSNY Sara - - 7% 72% 21%
22 LI Sophia M. - - 2% 18% 45% 33% 2%
23 SHEN Emilia - 4% 18% 36% 32% 10% 1%
24 CHOW Annabelle - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
25 DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) - 4% 22% 41% 27% 6% -
26 PENG Charlotte 4% 23% 40% 27% 6% -
27 LEE Lavender - - - 2% 14% 42% 41%
28 GU Maggie Runlin - - 5% 23% 42% 28% 3%
29 ZHOU Catherine - 1% 7% 25% 41% 23% 4%
30 CHANG Elizabeth - - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10%
31 HAN Crystal - - 3% 15% 39% 37% 5%
32 ROY Layla - - 2% 15% 44% 39%
33 CHEN Renee - - 1% 12% 49% 34% 4%
34 WANG Zoie Z. - - 2% 11% 32% 40% 14%
35 SHENG Chuxi - - 1% 6% 26% 45% 22%
36 OH Ceana 1% 11% 36% 36% 14% 2% -
37 KAPUSTINA Arina - 5% 25% 41% 25% 5%
38 SIMONOV Dasha - - 1% 9% 54% 36%
39 KIM Rachel - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
40 AYUPOVA AMELIYA - - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
41 LIU Jaelyn A. - - - - 2% 25% 72%
42 LOLA DUPUIS - - 3% 20% 44% 29% 3%
43 XIE Lillian 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1%
44 BURBERRY Livia - 3% 15% 35% 34% 11% 1%
45 LAI Sophia 1% 8% 25% 36% 23% 6% -
46 MCLANE Katherine 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
47 MCSHERRY Ava - 4% 23% 43% 25% 5% -
48 PAULUS Sloane 4% 27% 44% 22% 4% - -
49 KUMAMOTO Shino - 3% 13% 30% 34% 17% 3%
50 WEI Angela 4% 22% 39% 28% 7% -
51 COOPER Piper W. - 1% 8% 29% 45% 18%
52 BAWA Sahana - 11% 36% 36% 14% 2%
53 HUBERT AVA CLAIRE 3% 19% 37% 30% 10% 1% -
54 LEVY Avery - 3% 17% 38% 32% 9% -
55 HO Addison - 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
56 SWANSON Alexa 1% 8% 26% 38% 23% 5% -
57 BIODROWICZ Julia - - 4% 19% 41% 32% 4%
58 RICHARD Dominique 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
59 CASCONE Emily - - 4% 20% 38% 30% 8%
60 WANG SIQI - 1% 6% 21% 37% 28% 8%
61 DAVIS Logan 2% 13% 34% 36% 13% 1%
62 HAN Ashley - 3% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2%
63 FENG Grace 1% 11% 30% 36% 19% 4% -
64 YANG Emma 21% 49% 29% 1% -
65 DONDERIS Katherine - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13% 1%
66 GLASSON Sophia - 1% 6% 21% 38% 28% 6%
67 REN Kayley 4% 25% 43% 22% 5% 1% -
68 HAFEZ Tahiyah - 9% 39% 43% 7% -
69 SOLDATOVA Maria - - 4% 23% 48% 24%
70 DENG Melissa 4% 24% 42% 26% 4% - -
71 YAN Noelle - 1% 16% 46% 30% 6% -
72 PHILLIPS Hattie 1% 7% 24% 37% 24% 6% -
73 TRACZ Calleigh D. 1% 7% 23% 35% 25% 7% 1%
74 LENK Sophie 11% 31% 35% 18% 5% - -
74 YU Jane 17% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
76 WANG CAROL 27% 42% 24% 7% 1% - -
77 MARISI Gianna - - 4% 20% 40% 32% 4%
78 RICHARD Clara 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
79 PAULUS Isabella 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
80 MAZILLE PAULINE - - 4% 22% 48% 24% 1%
81 GAO Anne 6% 35% 40% 16% 3% - -
81 CHAIDAKIS ALEXINA 4% 20% 35% 29% 11% 1% -
83 CHOUET LISE 5% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
84 WANG Reese 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
85 MARTIRE Alessandra 1% 12% 32% 34% 17% 3% -
85 BROWN Lola 5% 26% 38% 23% 6% 1% -
87 PARK Lina - 2% 14% 35% 36% 13% -
88 COX Sophia 2% 19% 48% 26% 5% - -
89 SHMUKLER Maria 5% 25% 42% 25% 4% - -
90 LUO Miranda 33% 48% 18% - -
91 PEVZNER Nicole 19% 48% 31% 2% -
92 VIJAYAKUMAR Diya 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
93 EVELAND Zoe 1% 18% 48% 30% 3% -
94 MAJID Inaaya 25% 43% 26% 6% - -
95 GUEVARRA Isabelle C. 13% 37% 35% 13% 2% -
95 REYNOLDS Lourdes 12% 50% 32% 6% - -
97 CANO Sofia 69% 28% 3% - - -
98 LICHTENSTEIGER Megan 4% 39% 40% 15% 2% -
99 SAIFEE Lamya 13% 40% 34% 12% 2% - -
100 LI Katerina 34% 43% 19% 4% - - -
101 BURGESS Logan 14% 40% 35% 11% 1% - -
102 JOO Natalie 3% 15% 34% 32% 14% 2% -
103 WANG Sunny 11% 34% 36% 16% 3% - -
103 KUSHLY Dea 16% 37% 31% 13% 3% - -
105 LI Han 11% 35% 36% 15% 3% - -
106 LIU Lucy 39% 43% 16% 3% - - -
106 LI Eleanor 46% 41% 11% 1% - - -
108 HSU Kaylin 4% 20% 36% 28% 10% 2% -
109 TEPMAN Alexandra D. 12% 34% 35% 16% 3% - -
110 ZHANG Alina 22% 41% 28% 8% 1% - -
111 PIQUETTE Annika 37% 45% 16% 2% - - -
111 FIELD Julianna 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1% -
113 BERGEL Daphne 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% - -
114 NIRGUDE Esha 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% 1% -
115 JIN Amie 43% 45% 11% 1% - - -
116 ZELDIN Nadia 17% 39% 32% 11% 2% - -
116 SUNMAN Rory 30% 51% 17% 2% - - -
118 WANG Jolie Z. 18% 40% 31% 10% 1% - -
119 DESERANNO Seren 5% 24% 38% 26% 7% 1% -
120 LEE emily 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1% -
121 CHAKRAPANI Ila 83% 16% 1% - - -
122 HUANG Ariel Y. 63% 32% 5% - - - -
122 DONG Angela 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 2% -
124 OWENS Elise 5% 24% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
124 CAO Kayla 21% 41% 29% 8% 1% - -
126 DHULIPALA Aparna 27% 48% 21% 4% - - -
126 VANMOORSEL Faye 29% 44% 22% 4% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.