Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 75% | ||
2 | EYER Hailey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
3 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 78% |
3 | FEDELI Caterina S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% |
5 | ORVANANOS Anice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 28% |
6 | LIU Angel(Daying) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
7 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
8 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
9 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% |
10 | MEI Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
11 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 48% | |
12 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
13 | MI Aileen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | 8% |
14 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
14 | HAYES Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
16 | YANG Iris | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
17 | SEO IRENE Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
18 | CHO Rebecca H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
19 | CALISE Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 10% |
20 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
21 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 21% | ||
22 | LI Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | 2% |
23 | SHEN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
24 | CHOW Annabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
25 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - |
26 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | - | |
27 | LEE Lavender | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
28 | GU Maggie Runlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 31% | 3% |
29 | ZHOU Catherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 4% |
30 | CHANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
31 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 43% | 5% |
32 | ROY Layla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% | |
33 | CHEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 38% | 4% |
34 | WANG Zoie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 14% |
35 | SHENG Chuxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 22% |
36 | OH Ceana | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - |
37 | KAPUSTINA Arina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 5% | |
38 | SIMONOV Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 36% | |
39 | KIM Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
40 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 8% |
41 | LIU Jaelyn A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% |
42 | LOLA DUPUIS | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | 3% |
43 | XIE Lillian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
44 | BURBERRY Livia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
45 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
46 | MCLANE Katherine | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
47 | MCSHERRY Ava | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - |
48 | PAULUS Sloane | 100% | 96% | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
49 | KUMAMOTO Shino | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
50 | WEI Angela | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - | |
51 | COOPER Piper W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% | |
52 | BAWA Sahana | 100% | 100% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
53 | HUBERT AVA CLAIRE | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
54 | LEVY Avery | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | - |
55 | HO Addison | 100% | 100% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
56 | SWANSON Alexa | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% | - |
57 | BIODROWICZ Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 36% | 4% |
58 | RICHARD Dominique | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
59 | CASCONE Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% |
60 | WANG SIQI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
61 | DAVIS Logan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% | |
62 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
63 | FENG Grace | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
64 | YANG Emma | 100% | 79% | 30% | 1% | - | ||
65 | DONDERIS Katherine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
66 | GLASSON Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
67 | REN Kayley | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
68 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 100% | 90% | 51% | 8% | - | |
69 | SOLDATOVA Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 24% | |
70 | DENG Melissa | 100% | 96% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
71 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 82% | 37% | 6% | - |
72 | PHILLIPS Hattie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - |
73 | TRACZ Calleigh D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
74 | LENK Sophie | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
74 | YU Jane | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
76 | WANG CAROL | 100% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
77 | MARISI Gianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 4% |
78 | RICHARD Clara | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
79 | PAULUS Isabella | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
80 | MAZILLE PAULINE | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 25% | 1% |
81 | GAO Anne | 100% | 94% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
81 | CHAIDAKIS ALEXINA | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
83 | CHOUET LISE | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
84 | WANG Reese | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
85 | MARTIRE Alessandra | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
85 | BROWN Lola | 100% | 95% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
87 | PARK Lina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | - |
88 | COX Sophia | 100% | 98% | 79% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
89 | SHMUKLER Maria | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 4% | - | - |
90 | LUO Miranda | 100% | 67% | 19% | - | - | ||
91 | PEVZNER Nicole | 100% | 81% | 33% | 2% | - | ||
92 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
93 | EVELAND Zoe | 100% | 99% | 81% | 33% | 3% | - | |
94 | MAJID Inaaya | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | - | - | |
95 | GUEVARRA Isabelle C. | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | - | |
95 | REYNOLDS Lourdes | 100% | 88% | 38% | 6% | - | - | |
97 | CANO Sofia | 100% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - | |
98 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | 100% | 96% | 58% | 18% | 2% | - | |
99 | SAIFEE Lamya | 100% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
100 | LI Katerina | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
101 | BURGESS Logan | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
102 | JOO Natalie | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
103 | WANG Sunny | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
103 | KUSHLY Dea | 100% | 84% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
105 | LI Han | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
106 | LIU Lucy | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
106 | LI Eleanor | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
108 | HSU Kaylin | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
109 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
110 | ZHANG Alina | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
111 | PIQUETTE Annika | 100% | 63% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
111 | FIELD Julianna | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
113 | BERGEL Daphne | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
114 | NIRGUDE Esha | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
115 | JIN Amie | 100% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
116 | ZELDIN Nadia | 100% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
116 | SUNMAN Rory | 100% | 70% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
118 | WANG Jolie Z. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
119 | DESERANNO Seren | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
120 | LEE emily | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
121 | CHAKRAPANI Ila | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
122 | HUANG Ariel Y. | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
122 | DONG Angela | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - |
124 | OWENS Elise | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
124 | CAO Kayla | 100% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
126 | DHULIPALA Aparna | 100% | 73% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
126 | VANMOORSEL Faye | 100% | 71% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.