Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THORNTON Ronald J. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 49% | 38% |
| 2 | MONTORIO Louis V. | - | - | - | - | 11% | 50% | 38% |
| 3 | BECKER William L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 47% | 43% | |
| 3 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | 1% | 14% | 42% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 5 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
| 6 | DOLEGIEWICZ Mariusz | - | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 34% | |
| 7 | ZIPPER Michael E. | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 8 | CHU Kevin | - | - | 2% | 17% | 54% | 24% | 3% |
| 9 | BACON Michael F. | - | - | - | 4% | 36% | 60% | |
| 10 | KRASOWITZ Jason | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
| 11 | GRAFF Jon | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
| 12 | KAOURIS George | 2% | 16% | 42% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 13 | ZOLLER Matthew | 7% | 31% | 42% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | LILLARD Samuel N. | 2% | 15% | 38% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | PENTON Robert | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 46% | 9% | |
| 16 | MIGHELL Jason | 6% | 35% | 41% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | NEMAZIE David A. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 18 | ZINNI Gene | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 19 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 2% | 16% | 40% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 20 | STATEN Joseph | 41% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | CHEN Lester | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | GOMES John F. | 28% | 44% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 23 | CHENG Jonathan | 17% | 43% | 32% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 24 | GLASSER Jerome | 21% | 49% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | SAMOTESSOV Vladislav | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.