Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THORNTON Ronald J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 38% |
| 2 | MONTORIO Louis V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 38% |
| 3 | BECKER William L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 43% | |
| 3 | ESCUETA Jr Antonio V. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 43% | 7% | - | |
| 5 | VIDOVSZKY Tamas J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | |
| 6 | DOLEGIEWICZ Mariusz | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 34% | |
| 7 | ZIPPER Michael E. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 8 | CHU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 27% | 3% |
| 9 | BACON Michael F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 60% | |
| 10 | KRASOWITZ Jason | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 11 | GRAFF Jon | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 8% | - | |
| 12 | KAOURIS George | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 7% | - | |
| 13 | ZOLLER Matthew | 100% | 93% | 61% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 14 | LILLARD Samuel N. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | PENTON Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 9% | |
| 16 | MIGHELL Jason | 100% | 94% | 59% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 17 | NEMAZIE David A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | ZINNI Gene | 100% | 70% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 19 | MARTINEZ Mario D. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 6% | - | - |
| 20 | STATEN Joseph | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | CHEN Lester | 100% | 47% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 22 | GOMES John F. | 100% | 72% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 23 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 83% | 40% | 8% | - | - | - |
| 24 | GLASSER Jerome | 100% | 79% | 30% | 4% | - | - | |
| 25 | SAMOTESSOV Vladislav | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.