Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TYSON Julian F. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
2 | GOOSSENS Bruno | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 50% | 28% |
3 | SPAHN Jeff | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
3 | PARY Theodore | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
5 | BLAKLEY Dwain | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% |
6 | MESSING Arnold | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
7 | DUFFY Gerald | 3% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
8 | CAMPE Kazimieras M. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
9 | THORESON Gary C. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
10 | LIPP Robert (Bob) J. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
11 | HEWITT Frank F. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
12 | FLINT James E. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
13 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | - | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% | - |
14 | BRONZO Thomas E. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
15 | BRYKCZYNSKI James V. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
16 | REA John P. | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
17 | CAMPANA, SR. Rinaldo A. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
18 | DOUGLAS Michael A. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
19 | WEBER Dick | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
20 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
21 | SCHWARY Irv | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 4% | - |
22 | SATTERWHITE William W. | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
23 | HENRY Mark R. | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
24 | CRAMERUS Pieter F. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
24 | MIERNIK marcel | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
26 | KATOPES Peter | 29% | 45% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
27 | VITOUX Michael E. | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
28 | DUNLOP Richard (Dick) M. | 39% | 40% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.