Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Jaelyn A. | - | - | - | - | - | 4% | 96% |
| 2 | AMR HOSSNY Sara | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 74% |
| 3 | AYUPOVA AMELIYA | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
| 3 | FEDELI Caterina S. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 87% |
| 5 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 90% |
| 6 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 34% | 62% |
| 7 | SONG Yuqiao Aprille | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 8 | LEE Lavender | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 38% |
| 9 | DOROSHKEVICH Taisiia | - | - | - | - | 1% | 19% | 80% |
| 10 | YANG Iris | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% |
| 11 | KIM Rachel | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% | |
| 12 | KAPUSTINA Arina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 41% | 6% |
| 12 | DAVIS Logan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | - |
| 14 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 41% |
| 15 | LAI Sophia | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 1% |
| 16 | CASCONE Emily | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 38% | |
| 17 | PAULUS Sloane | 1% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 18 | OH Ceana | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 8% |
| 19 | CHEN Renee | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
| 20 | HSU Kaylin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 3% |
| 21 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 22 | CALISE Ella | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 23 | REN Kayley | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 24 | LENK Sophie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | - |
| 25 | JOO Natalie | - | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 3% |
| 26 | LOLA DUPUIS | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% |
| 27 | DAI Zizhuo (Zizi) | - | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 4% | |
| 28 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 5% | |
| 29 | SHEN Emilia | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | |
| 30 | GU Maggie Runlin | - | - | - | 2% | 28% | 54% | 16% |
| 31 | MCSHERRY Ava | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 42% | 15% |
| 32 | MAZILLE PAULINE | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 17% | 1% |
| 33 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | 7% | 53% | 35% | 5% |
| 34 | LI Han | 3% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | PENG Charlotte | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 3% |
| 36 | MARISI Gianna | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% | |
| 37 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 39% | 7% | |
| 38 | YANG Emma | - | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 39 | SWANSON Alexa | - | 6% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 3% | |
| 40 | XIE Lillian | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
| 41 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
| 43 | FENG Grace | - | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
| 44 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 1% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | WANG SIQI | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 46 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% |
| 47 | SAIFEE Lamya | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 48 | HARRIS Julia | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | - |
| 49 | KIM Sydney | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 50 | CHAIDAKIS ALEXINA | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | BROWN Lola | 1% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 52 | HAN Gian | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 53 | WANG Jolie Z. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 54 | WANG Amabel | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 55 | HO Addison | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 19% | 2% | |
| 56 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 41% | 14% | |
| 57 | YAN Noelle | - | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 58 | CHOUET LISE | - | 6% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 4% | |
| 59 | ZHANG Alina | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 61 | GAO Anne | 1% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 62 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 13% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 63 | DONG Angela | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 64 | WANG CAROL | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 65 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | 3% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 66 | COX Sophia | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 67 | LUO Miranda | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% | |
| 68 | DESAI Esha | 5% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 69 | JIN Amie | 6% | 28% | 43% | 22% | 1% | - | - |
| 70 | LICHTENSTEIGER Megan | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 71 | BERGEL Daphne | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | WANG Sunny | 10% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 73 | ZOU Ella | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 1% |
| 74 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 75 | HAN Mia | 9% | 35% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | LIU Caydence | 1% | 7% | 26% | 40% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 77 | ORRINGER Lottie | 4% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 78 | EYER Brooke | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | DAVID Lilou J. | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 79 | LI savannah | 8% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
| 81 | MCFARLANE Asha | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 82 | QUINTERO Camila | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 83 | CANO Sofia | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 84 | WANG DINA C. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 85 | PARK Zena | 3% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 86 | ZELDIN Nadia | 8% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 87 | CAO Kayla | 10% | 42% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 88 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 89 | HUTH Caroline | 38% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 90 | YU Jane | 5% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 91 | LI Olivia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 92 | ZHANG Ivy | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 93 | DUAN Sophie | - | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 94 | NIRGUDE Esha | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 95 | KIM Sophia | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | SAIFEE Zahra | 9% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | DESERANNO Seren | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 98 | DENG Melissa | 1% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 99 | SHMUKLER Maria | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 100 | VANMOORSEL Faye | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 101 | CAVANAGH Emma | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 102 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | - |
| 103 | MAJID Inaaya | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 104 | LEE Allison | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 105 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | LIN Yunong | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 106 | OWEN Alexandra | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 106 | NEWMAN-GILLIGAN Callahan | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 109 | PIQUETTE Annika | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 110 | JIN Sophie | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 111 | MEITZEN Havah | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 112 | ZHANG Constance | 27% | 47% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 112 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.