Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | CHUNG Kwangsuk | V D D V V V | V V V V V | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 2 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | KISSINGFORD John F. | V V V V V D | V V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 5 | HABALA Peter | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 6 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
| 7 | LAWRENCE John W. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 8 | CHEN David A. | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | V V V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 10 | CAMERON Matt W. | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 11 | MARTOS Darwin C. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | V D D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | ESTELL Oscar M. | D V V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | GRISWOLD Doug | D V V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 15 | POWERS Douglas A. | D V D D V V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | D V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 17 | TANG Julian | D V V V V D | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 18 | GROSS Stephen R. | D V V D D V | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 19 | PASHBY Stephen N. | V D D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 20 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | D V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 21 | WALL Aaron J. | V D V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 22 | FADL Omar | D D D D V V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 23 | WILBERT Matt | D V D V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 24 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | D D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 25 | SCHREIBER Gyula S. | D D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 26 | GLADNICK Michael J. | D D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 27 | NEWSON Frank | D V D D D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 28 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 29 | ALLAN Peter L. | D V D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 30 | JONES Bryan T. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | ZEISS Gary M. | V D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 32 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 33 | LEE David S. | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 34 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 34 | HAN Jae | D D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.