Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHUNG Kwangsuk | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
2 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
3 | KISSINGFORD John F. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
5 | HABALA Peter | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% |
6 | KAIHATSU Edward J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
7 | LAWRENCE John W. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
8 | CHEN David A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 36% | 5% |
9 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 39% | 15% |
10 | CAMERON Matt W. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 33% | 4% |
11 | MARTOS Darwin C. | - | 2% | 16% | 40% | 32% | 8% | - |
12 | GRAJALES Nestor L. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% |
12 | ESTELL Oscar M. | - | 10% | 35% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
14 | GRISWOLD Doug | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
15 | POWERS Douglas A. | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
16 | STRICKLAND Michael C. | - | - | 8% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 1% |
17 | TANG Julian | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 45% | 22% |
18 | GROSS Stephen R. | - | - | 6% | 29% | 43% | 21% | 1% |
19 | PASHBY Stephen N. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
20 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 3% | 22% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
21 | WALL Aaron J. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
22 | FADL Omar | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% |
23 | WILBERT Matt | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
24 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | SCHREIBER Gyula S. | 1% | 19% | 55% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
26 | GLADNICK Michael J. | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
27 | NEWSON Frank | 78% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
28 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 28% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
29 | ALLAN Peter L. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
30 | JONES Bryan T. | 8% | 66% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
31 | ZEISS Gary M. | 5% | 46% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
32 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
33 | LEE David S. | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
34 | MELCHIOR Donald L. | 34% | 46% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
34 | HAN Jae | 86% | 13% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.