Richmond, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YIN Julia | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
2 | LEE REGINA | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | PROFIS Liora | D V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
3 | LEE Claire | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
5 | SMUK Alexandra S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
6 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
7 | YILMAZ Pinar | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
8 | SHIV Avni | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
9 | WANG Jessie | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
10 | STERR Isabella M. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | LUO Amy | D V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
11 | ZHAN Nancy | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
13 | CAFASSO Natalya | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
14 | SU Evelyn | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
15 | PHUKAN Indra | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
16 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
17 | KUMAR Eva | V V V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
18 | QIU Emily | V V V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
19 | WATTANAKIT Anda | V D V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
20 | WANG Ziqi | V V V V D V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
21 | LISCUM Vivian | D V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
22 | MOLLINIER Anais | V D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
23 | NIX Reagan | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | V V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | HOY Emmarose | D V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
26 | RICHARDSON Meredith | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
27 | MONOVA Lilyana | D V D V V V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
28 | BOROTKO Katerina | V V V V D D | V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
29 | FRANGER Macy | V D V V D V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
30 | WANG Victoria | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
31 | SUICO Kyubi Emmanuelle | D V D V D V | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
32 | CUEVA Viola | V D D D D D | V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
33 | GUO Luxi | D V V V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
34 | IYER Ishana | V D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
35 | MISHIMA Audrey | V D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
36 | LEE Gloria | D V V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
37 | BEATIE Isabella M. | V D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
38 | SUN Hanya | V V D V V D | D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
39 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | D V V V D V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
40 | MCQUEEN Morgan | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
41 | LEE Camilla | V V D D V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
42 | CARRIER Meredith | V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
43 | YOUNG VIVIAN | V V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
44 | WRIGHT Madison | V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
45 | GUAN Isabella | D D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
46 | NOVOJILOV Anastasia | D V V V D D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
47 | SOLDATOVA Sophia | V D V D D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
48 | JI Catherine | V V V D D D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
49 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | V D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
50 | SUN Zeyu | V V D D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
51 | WANG Sara | D V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
52 | HANKINS Morgan | D D V D V V | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
53 | TALANDZEVICIUS Sophia | V D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
54 | BI Michelle | V V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
55 | HALE Avery | D D V D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
56 | SHAYAKHMETOVA Suzanna | V D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
57 | MENKIN Kate | D D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
58 | GANSER Nicole | D D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
59 | YOUSSEF Caroline | D V D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
60 | WANG Ziqiao | D D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
61 | TISMENSKY Avital | D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
62 | TAM Connie | D V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
63 | QI Julieanne | D D D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
64 | KANASKAR Ila | D D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
65 | SCHMITT Harper | D V D V V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
66 | NEELAM Navya | D V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
67 | LIN Ariel | D V V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
68 | MARTINEZ Christina | V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
69 | NGUYEN Ella | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
70 | DESAI Ela | V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
71 | CHADDA Farah | D D D V V | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
72 | LY Hannah | V V D D D D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
73 | WOOLF Fredrika | V D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
73 | ZHONG Isabell | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
75 | CHEN Alina | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
76 | YAO Chloe | D V D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
77 | LEE Kate | D D V D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
78 | WU Jessica | D D D D D V | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
79 | KUPPUSAMY Mahaa | D V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
80 | PEI Claire | V D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
81 | ZHANG Jane | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
82 | WORKNEH Lulit | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
82 | XU Serena | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
84 | KROPP Anne | D D D D D V | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
85 | XU Jessica | V D D D D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
86 | ELTERMAN Kate | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
87 | FANG jenna kim | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
88 | TISMENSKY Abigail | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
88 | STERN Savannah | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
90 | SCHOR Elisabeth | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
91 | OLSON Olivia | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
92 | WANG Sijia | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
93 | DESANTIS-IBANEZ Elena | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
94 | TISHKOVA-ROBERTS Daria | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.