Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2636 2781 - 2451
5 - 8 2289 2431 - 2136
9 - 16 1865 2060 - 1598
17 - 27 1422 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2781 2524.94
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2590 2316.76
4 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2451 2175.99
5 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2431 2170.72
6 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2420 2161.70
7 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2136 1863.74
8 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2169 1857.66
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2060 1796.32
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 2010 1752.04
11 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1987 1597.60
12 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1891 1506.65
13 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1818 1498.24
14 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1801 1432.72
15 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1753 1369.71
16 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1598 1280.62
17 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1571 1160.86
18 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1472 1130.62
19 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1498 1098.27
20 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1497 1085.59
21 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1420 1084.24
22 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1500 1066.27
23 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1339 952.61
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
26 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1127 306.28
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!