Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2664 2872 - 2458
5 - 8 2305 2429 - 2169
9 - 16 1853 2011 - 1692
17 - 27 1460 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2872 2611.87
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2602 2332.18
4 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2458 2197.68
5 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2429 2156.80
6 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2406 2148.91
7 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2217 1951.34
8 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2169 1857.66
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2011 1752.91
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 1991 1732.76
11 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1878 1557.83
12 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1879 1524.04
13 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1800 1502.63
14 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1810 1468.78
15 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1762 1382.30
16 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1692 1345.06
17 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1676 1342.80
18 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1588 1277.59
19 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1532 1221.38
20 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1548 1161.43
21 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1457 1146.05
22 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1439 1104.95
23 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1453 1054.83
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1149 377.50
26 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!