Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2652 2846 - 2446
5 - 8 2272 2437 - 2116
9 - 16 1788 2075 - 1545
17 - 27 1393 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2846 2587.65
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2595 2313.92
4 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2446 2188.66
5 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2437 2157.58
6 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2373 2109.36
7 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2161 1849.33
8 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2116 1835.75
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2075 1809.44
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 2002 1741.32
11 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1849 1510.74
12 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1901 1501.88
13 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1607 1287.42
14 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1641 1229.07
15 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1680 1200.66
16 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1545 1159.51
17 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1559 1135.14
18 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1593 1107.30
19 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1552 1074.83
20 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1410 962.23
21 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1338 927.99
22 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1300 883.04
23 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1163 613.66
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1187 318.93
26 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!