Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2652 2867 - 2460
5 - 8 2292 2429 - 2169
9 - 16 1857 2026 - 1690
17 - 27 1441 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2867 2611.01
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2559 2288.03
4 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2460 2198.88
5 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2429 2156.74
6 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2396 2138.48
7 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2173 1905.41
8 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2169 1857.66
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2026 1765.46
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 1990 1732.29
11 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1934 1567.55
12 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1852 1504.82
13 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1799 1502.10
14 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1810 1468.75
15 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1753 1369.71
16 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1690 1343.38
17 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1588 1277.54
18 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1614 1253.24
19 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1520 1206.99
20 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1462 1147.55
21 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1491 1092.34
22 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1457 1057.45
23 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1353 991.94
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1149 377.50
26 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!