Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2628 2788 - 2444
5 - 8 2290 2429 - 2146
9 - 16 1850 2042 - 1598
17 - 27 1413 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2788 2531.54
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2559 2288.03
4 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2444 2184.28
5 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2414 2157.61
6 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2429 2156.74
7 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2146 1876.26
8 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2169 1857.66
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2042 1779.21
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 1995 1736.91
11 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1966 1581.35
12 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1880 1506.35
13 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1795 1478.26
14 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1775 1412.37
15 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1753 1369.71
16 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1598 1280.62
17 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1544 1140.80
18 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1449 1112.18
19 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1493 1094.54
20 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1420 1084.24
21 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1483 1076.20
22 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1469 1043.93
23 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1334 948.58
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
26 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1127 306.28
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!