Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2682 2884 - 2498
5 - 8 2313 2444 - 2169
9 - 16 1844 2012 - 1692
17 - 27 1471 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2884 2623.39
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2623 2355.11
4 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2498 2235.85
5 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2444 2185.11
6 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2429 2156.80
7 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2211 1946.95
8 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2169 1857.66
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2012 1755.51
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 1991 1732.76
11 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1859 1546.08
12 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1878 1529.74
13 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1773 1479.85
14 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1781 1444.77
15 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1762 1382.30
16 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1692 1345.06
17 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1666 1338.60
18 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1588 1277.59
19 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1585 1236.26
20 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1527 1232.49
21 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1544 1194.17
22 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1490 1192.53
23 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1424 1094.95
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1131 378.25
26 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!