Peachtree RYC/RJCC & Y8

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Suwanee sports academy - Suwanee, GA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2698 2870 - 2521
5 - 8 2321 2444 - 2169
9 - 16 1845 2009 - 1692
17 - 27 1502 2098 - 1024

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Wong, Garrick Birmingham Fencing Club B24 2870 2609.59
2 Love, Aaron Epic Fencing Club A22 2723 2454.02
3 Emenheiser, Conrad Fencing Club At NC State C24 2677 2412.22
4 Yoon, Junhyeok Auburn Fencing Club B24 2521 2264.18
5 Fedeli, Francesco Epic Fencing Club C24 2444 2185.11
6 Smolich, Marat Research Triangle Fencing C24 2431 2159.24
7 Moe, Annan Orlando Fencing Academy C24 2241 1979.36
8 Fan, Yuchen Epic Fencing Club B24 2169 1857.66
9 Koe, Beckett Fioretto Fencing Academy D24 2009 1752.20
10 Dhokte, Neev Epic Fencing Club C24 1991 1732.76
11 You, Chanmin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1858 1556.36
12 Harkins, Asher Lotus Fencing Academy E24 1890 1547.68
13 Harwood, Gray Research Triangle Fencing D23 1773 1479.85
14 Lee, Noah Research Triangle Fencing E24 1781 1444.77
15 Thiyagarajaa, Ari Memphis University School Fencing Team E24 1768 1399.64
16 Lee, Junehyuk Auburn Fencing Club U 1692 1345.06
17 Karlekar, Ved Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1624 1303.67
18 Chang, Zane AIC Fencing Club E24 1629 1300.78
19 Chang, Xavier AIC Fencing Club U 1619 1286.82
20 Zhou, Alex Epic Fencing Club U 1588 1277.59
21 Han, Nathan Apex Fencing Academy U 1547 1256.87
22 Park, Jubin Nashville Elite Fencing Club U 1567 1254.65
23 Stansbury, Desmond OnTarget Fencing Club U 1521 1234.33
24 Eyster, Edison Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 2098 528.23
25 Gilliam, Elijah Lotus Fencing Academy U 1206 523.67
26 Morton, Luke Lotus Fencing Academy U 1099 310.54
27 Taylor, Benjamin Lotus Fencing Academy U 1024 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!