Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SUN Chloe | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 72% |
2 | JOO Natalie | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 1% |
3 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
3 | ZOU Ella | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 16% | |
5 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
6 | FENG Grace | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 40% | 24% |
7 | CULLIVAN Sienna | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
8 | ORRINGER Lottie | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
9 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
9 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% |
11 | LIU Enjia sherry | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% | |
12 | BROWN Lola | - | - | 3% | 14% | 37% | 39% | 7% |
13 | PARK Zena | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 4% |
14 | HARRIS Julia | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
15 | ZHANG Gwenyth | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
16 | OKADA MISAKI | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
17 | EYER Brooke | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
18 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 32% | 4% |
19 | HAN Gian | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
20 | LIN Yunong | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
21 | WANG Amabel | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
22 | LI savannah | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
23 | ZHANG Constance | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
24 | HUTH Caroline | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
25 | LI Olivia | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
26 | MCFARLANE Asha | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
27 | SHAOOLIAN Maya | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
28 | WANG DINA C. | 49% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
29 | BERNDT Camryn | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
30 | KIM Sydney | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
30 | HAN Mia | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | TANG Melody Fujiao | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
33 | RAFFAELE Nancy | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
34 | STEIXNER Mia | 8% | 34% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
35 | MUMMANENI Samyuta | 2% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
36 | SAIFEE Zahra | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | NEWMAN-GILLIGAN Callahan | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
38 | SHAOOLIAN Alexa | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
39 | MORENO Josefina | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | OWEN Alexandra | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
41 | BAULIN Zoya | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
42 | NAYGAS Alexandra | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
43 | FRASER Morgan | 3% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
44 | KIM Sophia | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
45 | HAFEZ Sahar | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
46 | ALLEN Sophia | 3% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
47 | TEPMAN Zoey | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.