Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | SEAL Julie T. | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% |
| 2 | GLUCK Myriam | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
| 3 | ALTMAN Leigh | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 3 | DENNER Jasmina | - | 1% | 9% | 46% | 45% | |
| 5 | OBLONSKY Natalia | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 46% | 10% |
| 6 | BERMAN Frauke | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
| 7 | DREYER Nadia S. | 7% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 8 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | - | 1% | 14% | 52% | 33% | |
| 9 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | - | 5% | 28% | 45% | 20% | 2% |
| 10 | FOLEY Eileen | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
| 11 | THORNTON Eva | 2% | 15% | 44% | 32% | 7% | - |
| 12 | WILSON Dawn J. | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | |
| 13 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 4% | 32% | 50% | 14% | 1% | |
| 14 | MAUL Judy L. | 13% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 15 | JOHNSON Pamela | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | DEGEN Anita L. | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 17 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 18 | DIEGEL Angela E. | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 19 | MORRISON Lori | 19% | 48% | 28% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | MARSH Lisa | 52% | 41% | 7% | - | - | |
| 21 | WU Yik Chun | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
| 22 | WEBB Maud | 22% | 52% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.