Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% |
2 | GLUCK Myriam | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
3 | ALTMAN Leigh | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
3 | DENNER Jasmina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 45% | |
5 | OBLONSKY Natalia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 10% |
6 | BERMAN Frauke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 24% |
7 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
8 | SHINN-CUNNINGHAM Barbara | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 33% | |
9 | RANDALL Cathleen Coyle | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 21% | 2% |
10 | FOLEY Eileen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 25% |
11 | THORNTON Eva | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | 7% | - |
12 | WILSON Dawn J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
13 | JEAN Emmanuelle C. | 100% | 96% | 64% | 15% | 1% | |
14 | MAUL Judy L. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
15 | JOHNSON Pamela | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
16 | DEGEN Anita L. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
17 | KNUTSON Theresa S. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
18 | DIEGEL Angela E. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 13% | 1% | |
19 | MORRISON Lori | 100% | 81% | 33% | 4% | - | |
20 | MARSH Lisa | 100% | 48% | 7% | - | - | |
21 | WU Yik Chun | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
22 | WEBB Maud | 100% | 78% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.