March NAC

Veteran Men's Épée

Monday, March 7, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Richmond, VA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 67%
2 SNIDER Jeffrey H. 100% 100% 99% 95% 79% 45% 12%
3 ROSTAL Scott E. 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 16%
3 MECHKOV Iliya 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 53%
5 FRANK Fred 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
6 MCGOVERN Vincent J. 100% 93% 62% 24% 5% -
7 SCHINDLER Sergey M. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 19%
8 KURITZ Marc M. 100% 100% 99% 91% 68% 32% 7%
9 O'LOUGHLIN Chris S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 74%
10 CRANOR Erich L. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 22%
11 WILKINSON Derek H. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 52% 16%
11 PERKA Michael 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 20%
13 BARTLETT Jonathan R. 100% 100% 97% 82% 47% 12%
14 FOSTER Kyle P. 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 29% 3%
15 DOWNEY Gerard C. 100% 100% 96% 75% 37% 8% -
16 TKACH Robert W. 100% 93% 59% 21% 4% - -
17 JOHNSON Jeff 100% 100% 100% 95% 78% 42% 10%
18 VARNEY John R. 100% 100% 99% 91% 58% 11%
19 SPAHN Jeff 100% 100% 94% 73% 39% 12% 1%
20 GAINES Aaron 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 9%
21 HENZLER Thomas A. 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 36% 6%
22 BLAKLEY Dwain 100% 100% 97% 83% 55% 22% 4%
23 CHENG Thomas 100% 100% 98% 83% 48% 13% 1%
24 LEE Tobias (Toby) T. 100% 100% 96% 79% 42% 9%
25 HERGERT Earl 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 23%
26 NEALE James H. 100% 100% 97% 81% 49% 17% 2%
27 STEWART Robert 100% 99% 93% 74% 42% 14% 2%
28 KAUFMAN Joel H. 100% 100% 99% 88% 56% 18% 2%
29 HAYENGA Gary M. 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 14%
30 GERSEN Jacob 100% 87% 51% 15% 2% -
31 GREENBAUM Isaac 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 23% 4%
32 DAVIS Andrew 100% 100% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
33 HUGHES Michael D. 100% 100% 95% 77% 43% 14% 2%
34 BARREIRO Darren 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 20%
35 CAMPBELL Alex 100% 99% 93% 72% 40% 13% 2%
36 STOCK Jordan 100% 98% 84% 51% 19% 4% -
37 MARIANI Lou 100% 99% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
38 YAO Shun 100% 100% 97% 82% 51% 18% 3%
39 O'DOWD Andrew J. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 34% 7%
40 SPRINGER Michael 100% 99% 93% 74% 41% 13% 2%
41 LUO Aaron 100% 97% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
42 DEUCHER Joseph H. 100% 100% 100% 98% 90% 62% 22%
43 SCHICKER Glenn 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 3%
44 MAYCHROWITZ Matt 100% 99% 92% 64% 25% 4%
45 GUMAGAY Paul 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 23% 4%
46 ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. 100% 96% 75% 39% 12% 2% -
47 WEINGARTEN Solomon (Sol) 100% 99% 90% 62% 27% 6% 1%
48 MARKOWITZ William M. 100% 92% 64% 28% 7% 1% -
49 KIM Jeff 100% 66% 22% 4% - -
50 KENT Dwain 100% 96% 72% 33% 8% 1%
51 NEWSOME James L. 100% 99% 91% 62% 24% 4%
52 LIPTON Michael D. 100% 89% 60% 26% 7% 1% -
53 SANCHEZ Leon D. 100% 95% 60% 21% 4% - -
54 OZANNE Jeffrey S. 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 1%
54 SIMMONS Matthew C. 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 10% 1%
56 KING Richard (Dick) M. 100% 97% 77% 41% 13% 2% -
57 SWANSON Dave 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
58 EVANS Allen L. 100% 97% 80% 48% 19% 4% -
59 SCHIAVONE Oreste 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
60 KLEIN Johannes 100% 96% 72% 31% 7% 1% -
60 BOYKO Frank C. 100% 90% 61% 27% 7% 1% -
62 FANGMAN Daniel L. 100% 96% 76% 37% 7% -
63 BECK Brian C. 100% 91% 59% 21% 3% -
64 MISCIAGNA Martin A. 100% 87% 50% 17% 3% - -
65 PIERRO Roger 100% 81% 41% 10% 1% -
66 FLINT James E. 100% 98% 88% 60% 26% 6% 1%
67 ZELENSKY Paul 100% 100% 96% 76% 41% 12% 1%
68 FRANZ Alfred M. 100% 47% 11% 1% - - -
69 CAAMANO Leo P. 100% 32% 4% - - - -
70 LIN Kimball 100% 95% 67% 29% 7% 1% -
71 BARAFF David 100% 71% 29% 6% 1% - -
72 RICH celester 100% 93% 67% 32% 9% 1% -
73 JOYNER Brian 100% 99% 89% 63% 29% 8% 1%
74 HESS Marc F. 100% 80% 36% 8% 1% -
75 KUHN Jeffrey 100% 65% 22% 4% - - -
76 CARVER Russell G. 100% 90% 60% 26% 6% 1% -
77 ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. 100% 99% 86% 52% 17% 2% -
78 WEIDMAN Jess 100% 51% 12% 1% - - -
79 SCHWARY Irv 100% 58% 17% 2% - -
80 LEONARDINI Barry M. 100% 60% 19% 3% - - -
80 O'REILLY Robert 100% 43% 9% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.