Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Sophie | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 42% |
| 2 | KIM Marley I. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 3 | LU Elaine | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 3 | WEI JoyAnn | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% | |
| 5 | JUNG Irene | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
| 6 | NATH Trisha | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% | |
| 7 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
| 8 | CHEN Kevy | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | LEE Hannah | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
| 10 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 11 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 53% |
| 13 | JEONG Katie | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 15 | DONG Angel | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | KHAN Alissa | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 17 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 18 | FEIG Sela | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
| 19 | NGUYEN Siena | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 20 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | |
| 21 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% | |
| 22 | DHAR Layla | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 23 | HU Michelle | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
| 24 | MUND Ruth | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 3% | |
| 25 | ZENG Sarah | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 26 | HENRY Soraya S. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
| 28 | BERMAN greta | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 4% | |
| 29 | MARGULIAN Maria | 6% | 32% | 40% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | XU Emily T. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 31 | DAI Olivia | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | SHI Julia | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 33 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 35 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 36 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% | |
| 37 | LIM Jaslene | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | HUANG Rachael | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 39 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 40 | YANG Lea | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
| 41 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
| 42 | LIN Nicole | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | FESTA Carina | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 44 | WU Helen | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 45 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% | |
| 46 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 47 | GOMES Diana C. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 48 | ZHANG Chenfei | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
| 49 | NICHOLAS Eva | 3% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 50 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 45% | 17% |
| 51 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
| 53 | ARNOLD Hali | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 54 | MYAT Chloe | - | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 45% | 16% | |
| 56 | HUAI Delilah | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 57 | STONE Coral | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | MARYASH Samantha | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 59 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 60 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 61 | LIU Yifei | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 62 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 2% | 18% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 63 | FAVO Isabella | 19% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | LOO Kaitlyn | 3% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
| 65 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 66 | CHO Michelle | 1% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 67 | ALTIRS Kate | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 68 | SHEARER Alena | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | GOLDIN Nina | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 70 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 71 | YU Zhiang | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 72 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 73 | WANG Zidan | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 73 | KINKADE Ellie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 75 | SPEARS Mya B | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 76 | SENOGLU Irmak | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 77 | YOUNG Audrey | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | |
| 78 | LI Alexis | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 79 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 80 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 81 | GAUTAM Sahana | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% |
| 82 | GARRETT Madrid | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 83 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 4% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 84 | HSU leah | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 85 | CANSECO Carly | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 86 | CHAN Jolene | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 86 | DANTULURI Shalini | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 88 | LIU Kelly | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 89 | HU Anna | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 90 | BERNARD Kathryn | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 91 | KHOST Maeve | 15% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 91 | BERRIOS Catalina | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 93 | CHIANG Melissa | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 94 | SCHOEW Margot | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 95 | MALEK Zolie | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 96 | WANG Jiayi | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 97 | MUNGUIA Mila | 2% | 33% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 98 | HAN Emma | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 99 | TENG EMMA | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 100 | WANG Callie | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 101 | TURIANO Nadelle | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 102 | CAO Sophie | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 103 | BROWN Olivia | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 104 | ZHANG Emily | 14% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 105 | ARMSTRONG Katherine | 5% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 106 | CHAVAN Arya | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 107 | ATTIA Jasmine | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
| 108 | BORGUETA Madison | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 109 | PADANILAM Lily | 22% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 110 | NEUMAN Ella | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 111 | BLAKE Anna | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 112 | BELEV Christa | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 113 | DEHON Inès | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 114 | CHI Claire | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 115 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 116 | BAO Jingxuan | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 117 | DANTULURI Shivani | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 118 | CHO Kaeli M. | 8% | 39% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 119 | ZHENG Ziqi (Jessie) | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 120 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 121 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 17% | 40% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 122 | MANSPERGER Gia | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 122 | POLSTON Ella | 8% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 124 | WENG Amber | 54% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 125 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 125 | LEE Tammy | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 127 | ROUIS Nina | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 128 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | HO Sophia | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.