Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
2 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 59% | |
3 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
3 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 6% | |
5 | JUNG Irene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
6 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
7 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 44% | |
8 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
9 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% |
10 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
11 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 26% | 4% |
12 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% |
13 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 6% |
14 | SCHIMINOVICH Sophia I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
15 | DONG Angel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
16 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 17% |
17 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | |
18 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
19 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% |
20 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
21 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
22 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 94% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
23 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 11% | |
24 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 3% | |
25 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
26 | HENRY Soraya S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
27 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 16% |
28 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
29 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 94% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | |
30 | XU Emily T. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
31 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
32 | SHI Julia | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
33 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
34 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
35 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
36 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
37 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 1% |
38 | HUANG Rachael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 5% |
39 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
40 | YANG Lea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% | |
41 | HWANG Gabriela M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
42 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
43 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | |
44 | WU Helen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
45 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
46 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
47 | GOMES Diana C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
48 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
49 | NICHOLAS Eva | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
50 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 17% |
51 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
52 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 2% |
53 | ARNOLD Hali | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
54 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
55 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 16% | |
56 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 8% | |
57 | STONE Coral | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | - | |
58 | MARYASH Samantha | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
59 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
60 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
61 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
62 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
63 | FAVO Isabella | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | |
64 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
65 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 29% | 4% |
66 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
67 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
68 | SHEARER Alena | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
68 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 7% | - |
70 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
71 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
72 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
73 | WANG Zidan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% | |
73 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
75 | SPEARS Mya B | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% | |
76 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
77 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | |
78 | LI Alexis | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
79 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
80 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
81 | GAUTAM Sahana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
82 | GARRETT Madrid | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
83 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
84 | HSU leah | 100% | 95% | 67% | 27% | 5% | - | |
85 | CANSECO Carly | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
86 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
86 | DANTULURI Shalini | 100% | 97% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
88 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 12% | 1% | |
89 | HU Anna | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | |
90 | BERNARD Kathryn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
91 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | |
91 | BERRIOS Catalina | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | |
93 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
94 | SCHOEW Margot | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
95 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
96 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
97 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 98% | 65% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
98 | HAN Emma | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
99 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
100 | WANG Callie | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
101 | TURIANO Nadelle | 100% | 79% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
102 | CAO Sophie | 100% | 68% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | |
103 | BROWN Olivia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% | |
104 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | |
105 | ARMSTRONG Katherine | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | |
106 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
107 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
108 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
109 | PADANILAM Lily | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
110 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | |
111 | BLAKE Anna | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
112 | BELEV Christa | 100% | 85% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
113 | DEHON Inès | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
114 | CHI Claire | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
115 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
116 | BAO Jingxuan | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
117 | DANTULURI Shivani | 100% | 91% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
118 | CHO Kaeli M. | 100% | 92% | 53% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
119 | ZHENG Ziqi (Jessie) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
120 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
121 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
122 | MANSPERGER Gia | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
122 | POLSTON Ella | 100% | 92% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
124 | WENG Amber | 100% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
125 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
125 | LEE Tammy | 100% | 43% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
127 | ROUIS Nina | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | - | - |
128 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 77% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
129 | HO Sophia | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.