Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
2 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
3 | SHCHUR Grayson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
3 | YILMAZ Tarik | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
5 | PARK Sangwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
6 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
7 | YANG Gary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
8 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% | |
9 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
10 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 4% |
11 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
12 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
13 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
14 | LEE Anton | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
15 | DOAN Christopher | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
16 | DAI Chengwen | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
17 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 9% |
18 | HUANG Yidong Allen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 35% | 6% |
19 | MOORE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 27% | |
20 | MOSTOVOY philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
21 | KIM Henry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
22 | WATTANAKIT Tawin | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
23 | ELMARSAFI Nurideen | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - | |
24 | BO Genero | 100% | 91% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - | |
25 | FALKIEWICZ Alec R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
26 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
27 | ZHOU Shawn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 16% | |
28 | FONG Henry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
29 | SOLOMON Aryeh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
30 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 92% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
31 | TANG Maximus | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
32 | ROSADO Balthazar Francisco | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
33 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
34 | YAO Tristan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 3% |
35 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
36 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
37 | DANILOV Artur | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
38 | WANG Marcus | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
39 | ADDYSON Aidan | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | GONZALEZ Gavin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
41 | KHERSONSKY Robert | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
42 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - |
43 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 4% |
45 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
46 | MILLER Xavier | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | LAM Jayden | 100% | 90% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
48 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | TUMULA Arihaan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
50 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 93% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
51 | HUYNH Matthew | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
52 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 8% | - |
53 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
54 | AMINI Artin | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
55 | ELMARSAFI Wissam | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
56 | CARCELLER Jeremias | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
57 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
58 | LI Stephen | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
59 | YI Joshua | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
60 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 97% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
61 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.