Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COTTER Liam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% | |
| 2 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | |
| 3 | KIM Benjamin H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | |
| 3 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 13% | |
| 5 | LEVIN Mark A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% |
| 6 | TANG Alex Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
| 7 | SUORSA Markus | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
| 8 | CHANG Colin S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | 5% | |
| 9 | HUANG Eric | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | |
| 10 | POPE Nico | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 12 | WILDMAN John | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
| 13 | BARBER William S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 14 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | |
| 15 | HASNAH Henry | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
| 16 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
| 17 | BARBER Brendan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 18 | LIU kelly | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 19 | OWENS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% | |
| 20 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 18% | |
| 21 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | RABINKOV Anthony | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 23 | WESLER Logan A. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | BERGER Oliver | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% | |
| 25 | CHEONG Heonjae | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 26 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% | 25% | 4% | |
| 27 | WUN William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
| 28 | LE Hayden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | MICHNA Colin P. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 30 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 26% |
| 31 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 93% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 32 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 34 | DESAI Drewv D. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 10% | |
| 35 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 51% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | RAJA Arnav | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | 13% | |
| 37 | KOTOV Leonid | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 38 | BRUSIE Christopher R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 39 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 40 | LEITH Jack | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | KILBOURNE Lance | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 42 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
| 43 | FONZO Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 12% |
| 44 | SCHERER Max | 100% | 85% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | PLONKA Derek | 100% | 88% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | ESPARZA Hilario | 100% | 64% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | MAURI Gherardo | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 48 | XU Luke | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ZIPPER Michael E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 50 | HUANG Zekai | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 51 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 14% | |
| 52 | REED Samuel J. | 100% | 83% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 54 | MALDARI Frank | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | PEARSON James G. | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 56 | REBELLO Derek | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LEUNG Nathan | 100% | 89% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | 100% | 84% | 40% | 6% | - | - | |
| 59 | MADRID Derek | 100% | 71% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | MEHTA Nalin J. | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 80% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 62 | CAAMANO Leo P. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | ROBERTS Sam | 100% | 87% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | LU Evan | 100% | 85% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 65 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.