Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COTTER Liam | - | - | 4% | 24% | 48% | 24% | |
| 2 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 3 | KIM Benjamin H. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
| 3 | MORRIS Samuel A. | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 42% | 13% | |
| 5 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 6 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 7 | SUORSA Markus | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 8 | CHANG Colin S. | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 29% | 5% | |
| 9 | HUANG Eric | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
| 10 | POPE Nico | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 11 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 12 | WILDMAN John | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 13 | BARBER William S. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 14 | ZU Kevin | - | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 39% | |
| 15 | HASNAH Henry | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 16 | BRAR Sanjeet | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 17 | BARBER Brendan | 3% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 18 | LIU kelly | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 19 | OWENS William | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 20 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 18% | |
| 21 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 22 | RABINKOV Anthony | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 23 | WESLER Logan A. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 24 | BERGER Oliver | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 25 | CHEONG Heonjae | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 26 | HONG Vincent Q. | - | 5% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 27 | WUN William | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
| 28 | LE Hayden | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | MICHNA Colin P. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 30 | QUAN Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 31 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | GORDON-SAND Spencer | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 34 | DESAI Drewv D. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 35 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 36 | RAJA Arnav | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 42% | 13% | |
| 37 | KOTOV Leonid | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 38 | BRUSIE Christopher R. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
| 39 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 40 | LEITH Jack | 28% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | KILBOURNE Lance | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 42 | YEN Preston | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 43 | FONZO Ian | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
| 44 | SCHERER Max | 15% | 43% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | PLONKA Derek | 12% | 43% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | ESPARZA Hilario | 36% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | MAURI Gherardo | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 48 | XU Luke | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ZIPPER Michael E. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 50 | HUANG Zekai | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 51 | COVINGTON Max G. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 14% | |
| 52 | REED Samuel J. | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 53 | OWENS Harrison J. | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 54 | MALDARI Frank | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 55 | PEARSON James G. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | REBELLO Derek | 6% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 57 | LEUNG Nathan | 11% | 36% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | 16% | 44% | 34% | 5% | - | - | |
| 59 | MADRID Derek | 29% | 40% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | MEHTA Nalin J. | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 61 | ELIN Adam E. | 20% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 62 | CAAMANO Leo P. | 19% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 62 | ROBERTS Sam | 13% | 43% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 64 | LU Evan | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 65 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.