Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 2 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 3 | KRASTEV Minna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% |
| 3 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
| 5 | CHIN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% |
| 6 | HU Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 7 | CHANG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
| 8 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 9 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 48% |
| 10 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 11 | YAO Rainie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 12 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 13 | ARMSTRONG Katherine | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 14 | TUNG Renee | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 15 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% |
| 16 | KUANG TongFei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | BROCK Sydney | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 18 | LEE Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 7% |
| 19 | NGUYEN Siena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 34% |
| 19 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% |
| 21 | PANIGRAHI Kingsley | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 22 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 23 | LO Chloe | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 24 | IYER Arushi | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 25 | CHO Michelle | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | STONE Coral | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 27 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
| 28 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 29 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 30 | JEFFORDS Sophia | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | HITOMI Nadya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 32 | LOMOTAN Addison | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | JIANG Mu Jia (Michelle) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | CHEN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 36 | YANG JIAQI KIKI | 100% | 86% | 52% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WANG Peijia | 100% | 95% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 38 | GOSAVI Aabolee | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | YAM Danika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 6% |
| 40 | SAAD Alia | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LI Sonia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 42 | KIM Caitlin | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 43 | SAWANT Asmi | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 45 | LI Esther | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
| 46 | WANG Jingming | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | GOLOVITSER Maya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 48 | MUNGUIA Mila | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | BAO Jingxuan | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | KIM Elyssa | 100% | 71% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 51 | HAN Emma | 100% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 52 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | OLKO Sophie | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | KIM Olive | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | WONG Christine | 100% | 96% | 73% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 96% | 69% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.