Boston Fencing club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% | |
| 2 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% | |
| 3 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 3 | BROU Inkosi | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% | |
| 5 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 6 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 7 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 8 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 10 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 12 | HUANG Tom | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | HAN Daniel Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 14 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 14 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
| 17 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 18 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 19 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 20 | EDELMAN Seth A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 4% | |
| 21 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 22 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 23 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | |
| 26 | EYBELMAN Ariel | 100% | 86% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 28 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 29 | LIN Philip T. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 31 | GINSBERG Jordan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | KAPOOR Tanmay | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | BROOK Joel | 100% | 79% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 36 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 37 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 38 | LAUB William | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | SABATINI Lucas | 100% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.