Orange County Convention Center - Hall WD1 - Orlando, FL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
2 | SANTA Bianca Estefania | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% | |
3 | DONGES Anna | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% | |
3 | VICKERMAN Lilly | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
5 | LEE yat ching | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 32% |
6 | MOYNIHAN Jones | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
7 | CREMONA Viola Maria | - | - | 1% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 13% |
8 | BORGES Valeryn | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% |
9 | WONG Caitlin | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
10 | FIGUEROA Mariah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
11 | WALTER Anna | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
12 | GUAN Isabella | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
13 | FRAGER Soleil | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
14 | CUEVA Viola | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
15 | DAVIS Elisabeth | 9% | 36% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
16 | SKILLMAN Natalie | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
17 | NIEMAN Aubrey | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
18 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 5% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
20 | LOZIER Grace | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
21 | FORDER Isabel | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
22 | LY Hannah | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
23 | FERNLUND Helen | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
24 | KIM Emily | 13% | 42% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
25 | SHARMA Maya | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% |
26 | YANG Emily | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | FLITMAN Hannah | 4% | 31% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.