Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 35% | |
2 | REID Sobia | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
3 | GLASSNER Sophia Rose S. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
3 | RUSSELL Renata | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 36% | 9% | |
5 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
6 | SLAGLE Mariah | - | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% |
7 | DARANOUVONG Logan | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
8 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
9 | PALMER Amelia C. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
10 | WEBER Nora | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
11 | RASMUSSEN Ashelee | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
12 | GERARDIN Marie | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
13 | FENG Kelly L. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
14 | MAO Amy | - | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
15 | DING Sandra | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
16 | SON Katherine (Injee) | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
17 | ZHANG Rachel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
18 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
19 | LI AnnieSiliang | - | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 3% |
20 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
21 | RYAN Minhuey | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
22 | BYRON Karen J. | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
23 | BELSLEY Devon K. | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% | |
24 | CAMERON Maya | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
25 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 10% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
26 | HUANG audrey | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
27 | MOK Chloe R. | 22% | 44% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
27 | PARTE Isabella B. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
29 | OGANESIAN Alice N. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
30 | CHEN Jephanie Y. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
31 | SCHLIEP Anna J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 19% |
32 | SCHMUGAR Brooke | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% | |
33 | CHRISTIAN Lyn T. | 1% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
34 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 2% | 13% | 36% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
35 | SHAH Chloe | 19% | 41% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
36 | DU Yiyun (Doreen) | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
37 | DEVLIN Wilhelmina | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
38 | CAREY Michele S. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
39 | DRONAMRAJU Navya | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
40 | DU Angela | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
41 | JI Catherine | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
42 | LI Tiffany | 13% | 39% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | |
43 | YOUNG Kaitlin | 2% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
44 | MOHEBI Sue | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
45 | DUAN Jenny S. | - | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - |
46 | ROWLAND May | 31% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
47 | DANIEL Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 44% | 20% | |
48 | ESTRADA Anna G. | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
49 | NOLLNER Jennifer R. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
50 | NICOU Nicole | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
51 | WATTS Reganne M. | 26% | 44% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
52 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
53 | MCGARY Amy | 17% | 42% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
54 | WILKENS Patricia A. | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
55 | IVANOVA Olga | 12% | 48% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | RHEA Heather | 66% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
57 | GROCE Linda J. | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
58 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 75% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.