Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ROJAS Jorge | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 44% |
2 | ORTIZ Zachary M. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
3 | GRISWOLD Abel B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
3 | LIU Kevin B. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% | |
5 | KONG Kenneth | - | - | - | 8% | 31% | 43% | 18% |
6 | WU Michael | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
8 | ZHOU TIMMY | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
9 | CHOI Ethan L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
10 | LEE Connor C. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
10 | DROUTMAN Ryan | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
12 | KASI Sanjay | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 31% |
13 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
14 | KLEIN Caleb R. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% |
15 | CLAY Jacob M. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
16 | BALL James T. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
17 | MILLER Braeden G. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
18 | BAE Kevin | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
19 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 15% |
20 | HAN Andersen Y. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
21 | MANGE Nathan | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
22 | TRAUGOT Braden (Brady) C. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
23 | TSAI Philip W. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
24 | KIM Aaron J. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
25 | WANG Andrew | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 6% |
26 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
28 | SELENDY Maximilian (Max) A. | 1% | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
29 | DAVIS Christopher M. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
30 | CURLEY Sebastian D. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
31 | BERK Theodore | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
32 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
33 | CARTER Lucas M. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
34 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
35 | LI Nicholas X | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
36 | DIERKS Kian | - | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
37 | YI Stephen K. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
38 | XIAO EDWARD | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
39 | RYAN Francis D. | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
40 | AVRON Case B. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
41 | UM Christian J. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
42 | TSAI Max W. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
43 | SWEENEY Quinn | 2% | 18% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 9% | 49% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | ANTONIO Marcky C. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
46 | FRITZ Ayden R. | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | VLACK Felix | 12% | 41% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
48 | QUINONES Diego A. | 6% | 28% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
49 | SHAJI Karthik | 12% | 42% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
50 | TSUEI Marcus | 21% | 46% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
51 | HSIUNG Richie | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
52 | DURAND Leandro M. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
53 | WOMACH Tristan | 41% | 45% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
54 | TOMINO rafael | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
55 | HUDSON Jonathan R. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
56 | JIN Honggu | 1% | 11% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
57 | DUBOEF Mason | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
58 | LIZARRAGA Sebastian | 18% | 49% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
59 | SMITH Brandon J. | 22% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
60 | SHEIKH Arham | 23% | 42% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
61 | KIM Eui Seok | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 4% | - |
63 | AMRANI David | 39% | 40% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
63 | CHUANG Kian J. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
65 | JEFFERY Jakob | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
65 | WEIMER Grant | 74% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
67 | MASON Zachary A. | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
68 | PEREZ Joseph | 31% | 47% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.