UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIU Ethan | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% |
| 2 | HAN Derek | - | - | 5% | 22% | 45% | 27% | |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 3 | GUTH Joseph | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 5 | CHUANG Oscar | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 6 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 39% | 51% | |
| 7 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% | |
| 8 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 9 | STRINGER David | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
| 10 | LU Alex | - | - | 6% | 30% | 48% | 15% | |
| 11 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | - | 8% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
| 12 | SENIC Lucas | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 12 | KIM Daniel | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 14 | DESERANNO Leander | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% | |
| 15 | TAMIYA Masao | - | 3% | 22% | 43% | 27% | 5% | |
| 16 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 17 | SLUSHER Gideon | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 18 | BARCA Bryant | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 4% | |
| 19 | MAVANI Krishna | 2% | 18% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 20 | SUN Ryan | - | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
| 21 | GOGOI Kavi | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 22 | SUI Samuel | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 23 | KNIBBE Nathan | 1% | 9% | 41% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 24 | KUE Temujin | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | NAZARIO Dominic | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | LINCOLN William | 18% | 45% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 27 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 28 | FINDLAY Zachary | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 29 | HICKEY Connor | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | OZAWA Taishi | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | ZHENG Marcus | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 32 | WINGLER Cole | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | IANNI Renato | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 34 | LEE Ian | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | HEYBOER Jason | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | TURNER Jackson | 39% | 45% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 37 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | LATORRE Leonardo | 6% | 30% | 43% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | JOYCE Ryan | 26% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | KOLACKI Gabriel | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | GOODLIN Sean | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | ZMUDA Aiden | 16% | 44% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | NI Aaric | 52% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | TACK Everett | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.