UWM Sports Complex - Pontiac, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LIU Ethan | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 2 | HAN Derek | V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | V D V D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 3 | GUTH Joseph | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 5 | CHUANG Oscar | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 6 | ALLEN Henry G. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 7 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | V V D V V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | V D V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 9 | STRINGER David | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 10 | LU Alex | V V V D V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 11 | VANOYEN Dominick | V D V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 12 | SENIC Lucas | D V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | KIM Daniel | V V V V D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | DESERANNO Leander | V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | TAMIYA Masao | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 16 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 17 | SLUSHER Gideon | V V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 18 | BARCA Bryant | D D V V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 19 | MAVANI Krishna | D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 20 | SUN Ryan | D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | GOGOI Kavi | D V D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 22 | SUI Samuel | V D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 23 | KNIBBE Nathan | D V V D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | KUE Temujin | D V D D V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 25 | NAZARIO Dominic | V D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 26 | LINCOLN William | V D D V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | MASSIMINO Andrew | D V D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 28 | FINDLAY Zachary | D V D D V D | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 29 | HICKEY Connor | V D V D D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | OZAWA Taishi | D D D V D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 31 | ZHENG Marcus | D D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 32 | WINGLER Cole | D D D D D | V D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 33 | IANNI Renato | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 34 | LEE Ian | D D V D V V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 35 | HEYBOER Jason | D V D V D D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | TURNER Jackson | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 37 | MOLDOVEANU Roman | D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 38 | LATORRE Leonardo | D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 39 | JOYCE Ryan | D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 40 | KOLACKI Gabriel | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 41 | GOODLIN Sean | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 42 | ZMUDA Aiden | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 43 | NI Aaric | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 44 | TACK Everett | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.