Simpsonville Activity Center - Simpsonville, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TIKHONOV Ilia | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | SAKO Ayrton (A.J.) | V V V V D | V V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 3 | BIRT David (Dave) L. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 3 | LE Kevin | D V D V V | V V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 5 | RICKMAN Ian | V V V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 6 | TWEMLOW Sacha | V V V V V | V V D | 2.1 | 5 | +2.9 |
| 7 | BUI Henry | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | MILLER Jonathan (Jack) | V D V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 9 | CAMPBELL Joseph | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | MCKINLEY Manley J. | V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 11 | KELLY Michael G. | V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 12 | ARNOLD Benjamin | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 13 | DECKER Carlton | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 14 | SNYDER Ari | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 15 | PAYNE John T. | V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 16 | LIU Dylan | V V D V D | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 17 | MAI Ryan | D V V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 18 | COLLIER Baiden C. | D V D V V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 19 | WILKENS Patricia A. | D V V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 20 | NELSON Cole | V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 21 | SHELLABARGER Stephen | V D V D D | D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 22 | CATES Georgia | D V D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 23 | GEISSLER Maximilian | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 24 | RIGGINS Joshua | D D V V D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | CUNNINGHAM Rowan | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 26 | LY Gabriel | V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 27 | COTTEN Justin | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 28 | SIGALAS noah | D V D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 29 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 30 | ARZT Nicky | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | HERRICK Kerry K. | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 32 | HOLMES Sullivan | D D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 33 | GUTHRIE Jennifer | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 34 | CAULDER Morgan | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 35 | VON CLEF Claire | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 36 | MCKINLEY Griffin | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.