Fore Kicks Sports Complex - Taunton, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WU Alexander | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
2 | LI Eric | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
3 | TAHOUN Mostafa | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | |
3 | MIALL Steven A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 49% | |
5 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | - | - | 9% | 91% |
6 | SIMA Congyu Josh | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 51% | 25% |
7 | TIAN allen | - | - | 8% | 31% | 41% | 18% | 2% |
8 | DOCTOR Aidan L. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
9 | GONG Benjamin | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 45% | 21% |
10 | JIANG Owen | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 43% | 46% |
11 | LI Arvin | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 38% | 2% |
12 | ACHILOV Sayid | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
13 | MENG Zhaoyi | - | 1% | 21% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - |
14 | SHAO Eric | - | 1% | 28% | 44% | 22% | 4% | - |
15 | LI Aaron | - | 8% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 3% | |
16 | LIN Michael | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 11% |
17 | LIU Derek | - | 5% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% | |
18 | WANG mason | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 12% | |
19 | HE Xiangrui | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
20 | KAPOOR Aayan | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% | - |
21 | JI Aidan Y. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
22 | XU Ethan | - | 3% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | - |
23 | RNO Kyler | 1% | 7% | 28% | 41% | 19% | 3% | - |
24 | WANG Rory | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
25 | XU Andy P. | - | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
26 | HOLCOMB Cedric | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | - | - | |
27 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
28 | WANG Brian | - | 10% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - |
29 | SHEN Mingxuan | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
30 | FENG Michael | 8% | 50% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
31 | BAI Brian | 47% | 50% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
32 | YANG Dylan | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
33 | CHENG Ethan | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
34 | ZHAO Adam | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
35 | TANG Terry | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
36 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 6% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
37 | LI Ayren | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - |
38 | GE Daniel | 29% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
39 | KONG Luculentus X. | 6% | 35% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
40 | MCENTEE Owen | 1% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
41 | SURESH Rohan | 22% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
42 | TIBBETTS Justin | 48% | 50% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
43 | DANGELO Connor | 94% | 6% | - | - | - | - | |
44 | SOLOPOULOS James | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | |
45 | LAI Aaron | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
46 | MARSHALL Henry | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.