Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAUL Lila | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% | |
| 2 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | LU Elaine | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 5 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
| 6 | HILD Nisha | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 7 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 8 | CHEN Xinyan | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 9 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% |
| 10 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 11 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 12 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% | |
| 13 | LEE Hannah | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 14 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 15 | KIM Marley I. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 16 | HE Lizbeth | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
| 17 | DANK Dina | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 18 | NG Sarah W. | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 19 | MIKA Veronica | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 20 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | WHALEN Paige C. | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | CHEN Ashley | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 23 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 24 | CHIANG Emily | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 25 | WEI Vivian W. | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | - | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | SINHA Anika | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 28 | YU Melinda | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 29 | LIGH Erenei J. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 30 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 31 | LEE Sophia | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 32 | DENG Brooke | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 33 | TSUI Natalie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 34 | JOHNSTON Lily | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 36 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | MCKEE Ainsley | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | WU Helen | 11% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | JAVERI Amaya | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | JEONG Katie | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | CHEN Kevy | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 44 | XIAO julie | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | XU ALINA | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | HUANG Caroline | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 47 | JENKINS Scotland | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | KHAN Alissa | 38% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DIECK Miranda P. | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | DICKSON Linnea | 64% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | JIN Zhixin | 15% | 50% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.