Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 2 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
| 3 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
| 3 | LU Elaine | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 5 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% |
| 6 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 7 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 30% | |
| 8 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 10 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
| 11 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 12 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
| 13 | LEE Hannah | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 14 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 15 | KIM Marley I. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 16 | HE Lizbeth | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 17 | DANK Dina | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
| 18 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 19 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 20 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 22 | CHEN Ashley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
| 23 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 24 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | ANTHONY Alexia B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 6% |
| 28 | YU Melinda | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | |
| 29 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 30 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 31 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
| 32 | DENG Brooke | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 34 | JOHNSTON Lily | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 36 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 73% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 38 | WU Helen | 100% | 89% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 81% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | CHEN Kevy | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 44 | XIAO julie | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | XU ALINA | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | HUANG Caroline | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 47 | JENKINS Scotland | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 49 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 50 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 51 | DICKSON Linnea | 100% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | JIN Zhixin | 100% | 85% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.