Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Yunjia | - | - | 4% | 24% | 46% | 26% | |
| 2 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 3 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% |
| 3 | YIN Julia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% | |
| 5 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 6 | HAFEEZ Hiba | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% | |
| 7 | LI Suri | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% | |
| 8 | LI Yuhe | - | 3% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 7% | |
| 9 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | |
| 10 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 11 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Linden | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 13 | FURMAN Maria | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | FAN Elizabeth | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 15 | HAFEEZ Hania | 1% | 11% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 1% | |
| 16 | LIU Nicole | 16% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | DONG Ava | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 18 | CAFASSO Natalya | 15% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | AI Amy | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 20 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 21 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 37% | 11% | |
| 22 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 15% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | SU Evelyn | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 24 | YOU Isabel B. | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | BARCLAY Khyri | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 26 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG Esther | 13% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | LI yu | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 29 | LIN Elaine | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 19% | 44% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Trinity | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 32 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | KUMAR Eva | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | HAYNES Antonia | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | FAN Catherine | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 37 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 58% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CAI Yiyi (Phoebe) | 14% | 46% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.