Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHANG Yunjia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 26% | |
| 2 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% |
| 3 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% |
| 3 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 50% | |
| 5 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
| 6 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 7 | LI Suri | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 6% | |
| 8 | LI Yuhe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
| 9 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 13% | |
| 10 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 5% | |
| 11 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | |
| 12 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 99% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 13 | FURMAN Maria | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 14 | FAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 15 | HAFEEZ Hania | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 1% | |
| 16 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 84% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 17 | DONG Ava | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 85% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
| 20 | QI Jarynne Valerie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 21 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
| 22 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 100% | 85% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 24 | YOU Isabel B. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | BARCLAY Khyri | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG Esther | 100% | 87% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | LI yu | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 29 | LIN Elaine | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 100% | 81% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | WANG Trinity | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% | |
| 32 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | KUMAR Eva | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | HAYNES Antonia | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | FAN Catherine | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 37 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CAI Yiyi (Phoebe) | 100% | 86% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.