Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SHELIN Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 2 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 3 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% | |
| 3 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 5 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 38% |
| 6 | LAVERY Chloe K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | |
| 7 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | |
| 8 | FILONOVA Alisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 20% |
| 9 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% |
| 10 | KUKVA Taisiya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% | |
| 11 | LEE Samantha X. | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
| 12 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
| 13 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 23% | |
| 14 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 15 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | CHUNG Penelope | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 17 | CHANG Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
| 18 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
| 19 | MA Katelyn | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 20 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 14% | |
| 21 | LEWIS Rachel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 15% | 1% | |
| 22 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
| 23 | DUONG Zoey | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 28% | 5% | - |
| 24 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 25 | BLANCO Ariia | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 26 | RUIZ Lusciana | 100% | 97% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LI Charlotte | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 28 | XU Celina | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | PHUKAN Indra | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 23% | 3% | |
| 30 | PEI Audrey | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 31 | GITI Aria | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 32 | MENDOZA zoie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 33 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 34 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 35 | LAI Amanda | 100% | 95% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | OPERARIO Abigail Z. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 65% | 18% | |
| 37 | HAU Olivia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | |
| 38 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | YOUSSEF Caroline | 100% | 57% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | SRIVASTAVA Arya | 100% | 89% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | ESTRADA Ariana | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
| 42 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 43 | MITRANI Gabriela | 100% | 86% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 44 | HASIM Eurietta | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | ENRILE Erica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 23% | 2% |
| 46 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 47 | LIANG Jingjing | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 48 | POON Desiree | 100% | 97% | 76% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 49 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 12% | |
| 50 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | CHEN Samantha | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 52 | DING Grace | 100% | 92% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | ADUSUMILLI Rishitha | 100% | 79% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | BROWN Riley | 100% | 81% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | SCANLAN Claire | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | KIM Isabella | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | MEDAMPALLI Vedhikaa | 100% | 93% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.