Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BEITEL Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% |
| 2 | KROON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 3 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 3 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
| 5 | KLEIMAN Jakob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 22% | |
| 6 | BYON Adrian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 25% | |
| 7 | VO Minh Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 8 | YAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 9 | COVINGTON Max G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 9% |
| 10 | BYON Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 11 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | |
| 12 | FOX Gavin | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 13% | 1% | |
| 13 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% |
| 14 | LEE Noah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 3% | |
| 15 | LI Yiwei | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 16 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 17 | DUDNICK Christian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 18 | MARQUEZ Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 19 | HUNTER-DORADEA Ernest | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | LO Andrew T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
| 21 | WONG James T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 15% | |
| 22 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 23 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 9% |
| 24 | POFF Kainoa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 25 | CHAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | BOWEI Yang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 27 | JAIN Aniket | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 28 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 29 | YAP Kah Kai | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 32 | OLARIO Raphael | 100% | 63% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHONG Xuan | 100% | 98% | 75% | 32% | 6% | - | |
| 34 | ODURO Jesse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 32% |
| 35 | NIETO Titus P. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | YU Kevin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 37 | FERGUSON Constantine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 38 | CAISSE Simon B. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 39 | HOLZ Lucas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% | 3% | |
| 40 | RAMTEKKAR Soham | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 41 | CAMERON Dalton | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 42 | CONTRACTOR Cyrus | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 43 | GILSHTEYN Jacob | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | BUI Joseph | 100% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 45 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 6% | |
| 47 | STONE Brad | 100% | 91% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | GARDNER David | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 49 | DE GUZMAN Earl Andrew | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 50 | YU Casey | 100% | 78% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JOHNSON Kai | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LEE Steven | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 53 | KNIGHT Brandon | 100% | 88% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 54 | WONG Austin | 100% | 95% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | CHAN Elliott | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | VENKATRAMAN Sudhir | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | SILVA Joaquin | 100% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LEIGH Edward | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | RIGG Brian | 100% | 61% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.