Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
| 2 | KALOPER Sofia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 56% | |
| 3 | CHEN Cynthia | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 63% |
| 3 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 38% | 8% |
| 5 | KOROL Dana | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% | |
| 6 | DO Leila | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 7 | RAO Sonia D. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 8 | WELBORN Calissa | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 9 | FUNG Vera | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 10 | HOBSON Ava | - | - | 4% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 11 | SUN Emily | 4% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 12 | LEE Allison | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 13 | PATTERSON Natalia | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 14 | FUNG Emma | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 33% |
| 15 | SPOHN Mary S. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | YANICELLI Sloane | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | SHUM Elizabeth | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
| 18 | CHOI Kailyn | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 19 | KETTELLE Molly | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 20 | PENG Serena | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | ZHENG Zoe | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 22 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
| 23 | WANG Brina | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 24 | MORALES Paulina | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | CABALU Alaina | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | XIE Su | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KO Claire | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | WANG Celine S. | 28% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | GOEL Riyana | 19% | 47% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | BECKSTEAD Makayla | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | SHUM Maya | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | LIU Jessica | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LUH Mia P. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 34 | MCKAY Teresa | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 3% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 1% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 38 | BALCE Cyril | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | CHALK Victoria | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MUNTON Melina | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LIU Yvonne | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.