Pasadena Convention Center - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 2 | KALOPER Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
| 3 | CHEN Cynthia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 3 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 8% |
| 5 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 53% | 11% | |
| 6 | DO Leila | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 7 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 8 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 11 | SUN Emily | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | - | |
| 12 | LEE Allison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 13% |
| 13 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 14 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 15 | SPOHN Mary S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | YANICELLI Sloane | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 17 | SHUM Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 18 | CHOI Kailyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 19 | KETTELLE Molly | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 20 | PENG Serena | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 21 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 22 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 23 | WANG Brina | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 24 | MORALES Paulina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 25 | CABALU Alaina | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | XIE Su | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 27 | KO Claire | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 28 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 81% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 30 | BECKSTEAD Makayla | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 31 | SHUM Maya | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | LIU Jessica | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LUH Mia P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 34 | MCKAY Teresa | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | ECKSTEIN Harriet A. | 100% | 97% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 36 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 37 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 38 | BALCE Cyril | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | CHALK Victoria | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MUNTON Melina | 100% | 91% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LIU Yvonne | 100% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.