Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Robert | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 2 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 3 | ROBINSON William | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 5 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 6 | FERNANDEZ Liam | 100% | 99% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 7 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
| 8 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 9 | BURGUNDER Quinten (Quin) A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 52% |
| 10 | TENG MATTHEW | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | LI Minghan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 14 | SHOMAN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 15 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 16 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 17 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
| 18 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 19 | SHOMAN Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 24% | 5% |
| 20 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | RODRIGUEZ Darlin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% |
| 22 | SLASTIN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% |
| 23 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 24 | MEDVEDEV Michail D. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | NG Jeremiah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | CORTEZ Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% |
| 27 | GREENE Cameron J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 28 | OH Triton | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
| 30 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 47% | 17% | 3% |
| 31 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 32 | ELIN Adam E. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 33 | OKEEFE Mitchell | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | CHEN Evan P. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 35 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 37 | MICLAUS Justin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 38 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
| 39 | LUTHRA Arjun | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 40 | MCCARTHY Devan | 100% | 78% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 41 | COLE Alexander | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | FORMENTI Giulio | 100% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 44 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 94% | 71% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 45 | STAMIS Kyle | 100% | 72% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 47 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | GINSBERG Jordan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 49 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 65% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | DESAUTELS Connor | 100% | 35% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | KOVACH Jonah F. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 51 | VILLARREAL Mateo | 100% | 93% | 65% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | DEKA Tanush | 100% | 89% | 56% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | DIMATTEO Michael | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | PODDAR Shameek | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.