Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 2 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 3 | NGUYEN Kira | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 3 | YIN Julia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 5 | MAO Amy | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 6 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 7 | QI Jarynne Valerie | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | ZHU Serene M. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 9 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 10 | LUO Ashley | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 11 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% | |
| 12 | MING Cynthia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 13 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 14 | LI yu | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 15 | DONG Ava | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | ZHENG Linden | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 10% | 1% | |
| 17 | XUAN Nicole J. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 46% | 26% | |
| 18 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 19 | LIU Nicole | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 20 | ZENG Katrina | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 21 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 22 | LI Suri | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 23 | FAN Elizabeth | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 24 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | AI Amy | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 26 | FURMAN Maria | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | CHEN Jingyun | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 28 | HAFEEZ Hania | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 29 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 31 | MARTINO Alessandra | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | JIANG Caroline T. | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 2% |
| 34 | HU Chelsea | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 35 | DENG Annie | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 36 | BEEM Marin | 10% | 33% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | LIN Elaine | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | BARCLAY Khyri | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | WANG Esther | 6% | 31% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 40 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | PAOLINO Grace | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 42 | YOU Isabel B. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | HOOPER Lucy | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | TYTELL Elizabeth | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | FAN Catherine | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 46 | ANOUSIS Angelica | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.